Paper · 2004 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Effect of Grain Amaranth and Tobacco Intercropping on Quality and Mineral Nutritional Composition of Tobacco Leaf

Tingxuan Li; MA Guo-rui

20
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The Grain amaranth and tobacco intercropping was conducted by soil culture in pot. The results indicated that the content of phosphorus in intercrop tobacco leaves has decreased 21.25% than that in the monocrop tobacco leaves, while the content of nitrogen, potassium and sulfur has increased 20.23%,63.86% and 13.71% compared with monocrop tobacco, respectively. The ability of potassium uptake by tobacco leaf under intercrop was higher than other elements significantly, which was 3.16 times and 4.66 times than that of nitrogen and sulfur, respectively. Compared with the monocrop tobacco, the content of microelements werehigher significantly at the level of P≤0.05 or P≤0.01, but Cu content was not. The content of molybdenum and Fe of intercrop tobacco leaves has increased 49.29% and 27.39% than that of monocrop. The ash content of intercrop tobacco leaves was higher 7.83% than the monocrop. The arsenic and chrome content of intercrop has reduced 15.65% and 12.75% than monocrop, while the cadmium and lead content has increased 8.73% and 13.97%, respectively. The content of soluble sugar and soluble protein was 1.44 times and 1.23 times than monocrop tobacco. The vigor of intercrop root and the contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll in intercrop tobacco have increased 12.64%,27.91%,37.50%,30.51% than that of monocrop tobacco, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced tobacco leaf phosphorus by 21.25%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
content of phosphoruse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
21.25%e0
Comparator
monocrop tobaccoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of phosphorus in intercrop tobacco leaves has decreased 21.25% than that in the monocrop tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco leaf nitrogen by 20.23%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
content of nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.23%e0
Comparator
monocrop tobaccoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercrop tobacco leaves has decreased 21.25% than that in the monocrop tobacco leaves, while the content of nitrogen, potassium and sulfur has increased 20.23%,63.86% and 13.71% compared with monocrop tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco leaf potassium by 63.86%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
increasede0
Value
63.86%e0
Comparator
monocrop tobaccoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercrop tobacco leaves has decreased 21.25% than that in the monocrop tobacco leaves, while the content of nitrogen, potassium and sulfur has increased 20.23%,63.86% and 13.71% compared with monocrop tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco leaf sulfur by 13.71%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
sulfure0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.71%e0
Comparator
monocrop tobaccoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercrop tobacco leaves has decreased 21.25% than that in the monocrop tobacco leaves, while the content of nitrogen, potassium and sulfur has increased 20.23%,63.86% and 13.71% compared with monocrop tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped tobacco leaf potassium uptake was significantly higher than nitrogen uptake by 3.16 times.

Outcome
potassium uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.16 timese0
Comparator
nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ability of potassium uptake by tobacco leaf under intercrop was higher than other elements significantly, which was 3.16 times and 4.66 times than that of nitrogen and sulfur, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–556 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped tobacco leaf potassium uptake was significantly higher than sulfur uptake by 4.66 times.

Outcome
potassium uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.66 timese0
Comparator
sulfure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ability of potassium uptake by tobacco leaf under intercrop was higher than other elements significantly, which was 3.16 times and 4.66 times than that of nitrogen and sulfur, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco leaf molybdenum by 49.29%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
content of molybdenume0
Direction
increasede0
Value
49.29%e0
Comparator
monocrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of molybdenum and Fe of intercrop tobacco leaves has increased 49.29% and 27.39% than that of monocrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco leaf iron by 27.39%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.39%e0
Comparator
monocrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of molybdenum and Fe of intercrop tobacco leaves has increased 49.29% and 27.39% than that of monocrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco leaf ash content by 7.83%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
ash contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.83%e0
Comparator
monocrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ash content of intercrop tobacco leaves was higher 7.83% than the monocrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced tobacco arsenic by 15.65%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
arsenice0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15.65%e0
Comparator
monocrope0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“arsenic and chrome content of intercrop has reduced 15.65% and 12.75% than monocrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced tobacco chromium by 12.75%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
chrome contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
12.75%e0
Comparator
monocrope0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“arsenic and chrome content of intercrop has reduced 15.65% and 12.75% than monocrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco cadmium by 8.73%.

Outcome
cadmiume0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.73%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cadmium and lead content has increased 8.73% and 13.97%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco lead by 13.97%.

Outcome
lead contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.97%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cadmium and lead content has increased 8.73% and 13.97%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping raised soluble sugar to 1.44 times monocrop tobacco.

Outcome
content of soluble sugare0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.44 timese0
Comparator
monocrop tobaccoe0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of soluble sugar and soluble protein was 1.44 times and 1.23 times than monocrop tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping raised soluble protein to 1.23 times monocrop tobacco.

Outcome
soluble proteine0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.23 timese0
Comparator
monocrop tobaccoe0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of soluble sugar and soluble protein was 1.44 times and 1.23 times than monocrop tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco root vigor by 12.64%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
vigor of intercrop roote0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vigor of intercrop root and the contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll in intercrop tobacco have increased 12.64%,27.91%,37.50%,30.51%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco chlorophyll a by 27.91%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.91%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vigor of intercrop root and the contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll in intercrop tobacco have increased 12.64%,27.91%,37.50%,30.51%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco chlorophyll b by 37.50%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vigor of intercrop root and the contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll in intercrop tobacco have increased 12.64%,27.91%,37.50%,30.51%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased total tobacco chlorophyll by 30.51%.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.51%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vigor of intercrop root and the contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll in intercrop tobacco have increased 12.64%,27.91%,37.50%,30.51%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly increased tobacco leaf microelement content except copper.

Outcome
content of microelementse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
monocrop tobaccoe0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the monocrop tobacco, the content of microelements werehigher significantly at the level of P≤0.05 or P≤0.01, but Cu content was not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–704 · show in text ↑

intercropping · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

intercropping · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

intercropping · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.