Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Triticale rate and period of grain filling were maximal with 1 g/L NZO plus Azotobacter seed inoculation.

A claim from Effects of seed inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and foliar application with nano-zinc oxide on yield and rate and period of grain filling of triticale · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale rate and period of grain filling were maximal with 1 g/L NZO plus Azotobacter seed inoculation.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
1 g/L NZO and seed inoculation with Azotobactere1
Outcome
rate and period of grain fillinge1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
no NZO and no seed inoculation with PGPRe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In order to study the effects of seed inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and foliar application of nano-zinc oxide (NZO) on yield and rate and period of grain filling of triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205
e1

“Comparison of means showed that maximum yield, yield components and rate and period of grain filling was obtained by application of 1 g/L NZO and seed inoculation with Azotobacter, and minimum of these parameters were recorded for application of no NZO and no seed inoculation with PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–1003

Title

Effects of seed inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and foliar application with nano-zinc oxide on yield and rate and period of grain filling of triticale

H. Kamari; R. Seyed Sharifi Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture 2016. doi:10.18869/acadpub.ejgcst.6.4.141

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e91c43df407a2985faac3af912a320f526a6d9fb5210a16e37bb4f011edbe3a6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.