Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Raising K from 48 to 72 kg K2O/fed increased sucrose content, sugar recovery and recoverable sugar yield.

A claim from Influence of Potassium Fertilization and Foliar Application of Zinc on Sugar Beet Plants Grown on a Calcareous Sandy Soil · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising K from 48 to 72 kg K2O/fed increased sucrose content, sugar recovery and recoverable sugar yield.

Treatment
increasing theK level from 48 to 72 kg K2O fed.-1e1
Outcome
sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in both seasonse1
Comparator
48e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595
e1

“were significantly increased by increasing theK level from 48 to 72 kg K2O fed.-1 in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–693

Title

Influence of Potassium Fertilization and Foliar Application of Zinc on Sugar Beet Plants Grown on a Calcareous Sandy Soil

Kamal Attia; A Mohamed; El-Desoky; et al. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2016. doi:10.21608/ajas.2016.515

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e972ae82dce505127aa88d3e4dbeb7caceb9ecb3b6bc583cdc6310711a58e652 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.