Paper · 2016 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Influence of Potassium Fertilization and Foliar Application of Zinc on Sugar Beet Plants Grown on a Calcareous Sandy Soil

Kamal Attia; A Mohamed; El-Desoky; et al.

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted at El-Ghorieb Exp. Farm, Assiut University, Assiut,Egypt, during 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 seasons to investigate the effect ofpotassium fertilization (48 and 72 kg K2O fed.-1) and the foliar spray with threezinc chelate levels zero, 75, and 150 mg l-1 as Zn-EDTA (15% Zn) on yield andquality as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents of sugar beet plants grown on a calcareoussandy soil.- All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and rootfresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents were significantly increased by increasing theK level from 48 to 72 kg K2O fed.-1 in both seasons.- Increasing the potassium level caused an increase in the sucrose percentage.Moreover, a remarkable increase in the recoverable sugar percentage wasobserved as K level increased. Potassium fertilization showed a significantly increaseon sugar beet yields at 48 kg N fed.-1 level as well as 72 kg K2O fed.-1 fortop yield and recoverable sugar yield.- With regard to zinc foliar application, significant decreases on impuritiesand increases on sugar loss to molasses and sucrose percentage were observed. Italso had an insignificant effect on the recoverable sugar percentage. In mostcases, increasing Zn level up to 150 mg l-1 significantly increased the sugar beetyields fed.-1- Potassium fertilization x zinc foliar application interaction had a significanteffect on Na content in beet roots in both seasons. Moreover, significant effectswere observed only on K content in beet roots and sugar losses to molassesin the first season as well as top yield fed.-1 in the second season. It could be concludedthat application of the K fertilization at 72 kg K2O fed.-1 along with thefoliar application of zinc had a positive effect in increasing all growth traits ofsugar beet

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising K from 48 to 72 kg K2O/fed increased top and root fresh and dry weights.

Treatment
increasing theK level from 48 to 72 kg K2O fed.-1e1
Outcome
top and root fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in both seasonse1
Comparator
48e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“were significantly increased by increasing theK level from 48 to 72 kg K2O fed.-1 in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising K from 48 to 72 kg K2O/fed increased sucrose content, sugar recovery and recoverable sugar yield.

Treatment
increasing theK level from 48 to 72 kg K2O fed.-1e1
Outcome
sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in both seasonse1
Comparator
48e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“were significantly increased by increasing theK level from 48 to 72 kg K2O fed.-1 in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising K from 48 to 72 kg K2O/fed increased Fe, Mn and Zn contents.

Treatment
increasing theK level from 48 to 72 kg K2O fed.-1e1
Outcome
Fe, Mn and Zn contentse0
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in both seasonse1
Comparator
48e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“were significantly increased by increasing theK level from 48 to 72 kg K2O fed.-1 in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–693 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recoverable sugar percentage increased as K level increased.

Treatment
K levele1
Outcome
recoverable sugar percentagee1
Direction
increasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“Moreover, a remarkable increase in the recoverable sugar percentage wasobserved as K level increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–872 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization at 72 kg K2O/fed significantly increased top yield and recoverable sugar yield.

Treatment
Potassium fertilizatione0
Outcome
top yield and recoverable sugar yielde0
Direction
significantly increasee0
Qualifier
72 kg K2O fed.-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium fertilization showed a significantly increaseon sugar beet yields at 48 kg N fed.-1 level as well as 72 kg K2O fed.-1 fortop yield and recoverable sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc application decreased impurities in sugar beet juice.

Treatment
zinc foliar applicatione1
Outcome
impuritiese1
Direction
decreasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“With regard to zinc foliar application, significant decreases on impuritiesand increases on sugar loss to molasses and sucrose percentage were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc application increased sugar loss to molasses.

Treatment
zinc foliar applicatione1
Outcome
sugar loss to molassese1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“With regard to zinc foliar application, significant decreases on impuritiesand increases on sugar loss to molasses and sucrose percentage were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc application increased sucrose percentage.

Treatment
zinc foliar applicatione1
Outcome
sucrose percentagee1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“With regard to zinc foliar application, significant decreases on impuritiesand increases on sugar loss to molasses and sucrose percentage were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc application had no significant effect on recoverable sugar percentage.

Treatment
zinc foliar applicatione1
Outcome
recoverable sugar percentagee2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“With regard to zinc foliar application, significant decreases on impuritiesand increases on sugar loss to molasses and sucrose percentage were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1196 · show in text ↑
e2

“had an insignificant effect on the recoverable sugar percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing foliar zinc up to 150 mg/l significantly increased sugar beet yields in most cases.

Treatment
increasing Zn level up to 150 mg l-1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
significantly increasede0
Qualifier
In most casese0
Comparator
zeroe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases, increasing Zn level up to 150 mg l-1 significantly increased the sugar beet yields fed.-1”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1270–1372 · show in text ↑
e1

“the foliar spray with threezinc chelate levels zero, 75, and 150 mg l-1 as Zn-EDTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–286 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The potassium by zinc interaction had a significant effect on sodium content in beet roots in both seasons.

Organ / stage
beet rootse1
Treatment
Potassium fertilization x zinc foliar application interactione1
Outcome
Na contente1
Qualifier
in both seasonse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potassium fertilization x zinc foliar application interaction had a significanteffect on Na content in beet roots in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1503 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The potassium by zinc interaction had a significant effect on K content in beet roots and sugar losses to molasses in the first season.

Treatment
Potassium fertilization x zinc foliar application interactione1
Outcome
K content in beet roots and sugar losses to molassese2
Qualifier
in the first seasone2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potassium fertilization x zinc foliar application interaction had a significanteffect on Na content in beet roots in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1503 · show in text ↑
e2

“significant effectswere observed only on K content in beet roots and sugar losses to molassesin the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1627 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The potassium by zinc interaction had a significant effect on top yield in the second season.

Treatment
Potassium fertilization x zinc foliar application interactione1
Outcome
top yielde2
Qualifier
in the second seasone2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potassium fertilization x zinc foliar application interaction had a significanteffect on Na content in beet roots in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1503 · show in text ↑
e2

“as well as top yield fed.-1 in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1676 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium level increased sucrose percentage.

Treatment
Increasing the potassium levele1
Outcome
sucrose percentagee1
Direction
increasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics and quality traits of sugar beet i.e., top and root fresh and dry weights, sucrose content, sugar recovery, recoverable sugar yield,as well as Fe, Mn and Zn contents”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 405–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the potassium level caused an increase in the sucrose percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–771 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

potassium · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 36 positive, 4 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 37 positive, 3 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.