Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A-HA precipitated at pH 3 stimulated maize N uptake more than A-HA precipitated at pH 1.

A claim from Artificial rice straw-derived humic acids obtained via extraction with highly concentrated alkali solutions or precipitation at lower pH levels exhibit reduced biological activity in promoting maize growth and nitrogen uptake · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A-HA precipitated at pH 3 stimulated maize N uptake more than A-HA precipitated at pH 1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
A-HA precipitated at pH 3e0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
that at pH 1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A-HA precipitated at pH 3 exhibited superior stimulation of maize growth and N uptake compared with that at pH 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1274

Title

Artificial rice straw-derived humic acids obtained via extraction with highly concentrated alkali solutions or precipitation at lower pH levels exhibit reduced biological activity in promoting maize growth and nitrogen uptake

Zixin Ban; Yingqiang Zhang; Wenqi Han; et al. Industrial Crops and Products 2025. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.120630

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e97ee4b61a4f7fc8eeba39e4078cef2eecdeef70b1ac29a3f2abacf5fe00ac80 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

ph · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 107 positive, 12 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.