Intervention effectmodel-written summary

WRG-53 gave significantly higher benefit-cost ratio (BCR) than WRG-27 and WRG-56 in intercropping.

A claim from Performance of Pigeqnpea cultivars in fotercropping system under Rainfed conditions in Vertisols · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WRG-53 gave significantly higher benefit-cost ratio (BCR) than WRG-27 and WRG-56 in intercropping.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Material
WRG-53e2
Treatment
intercropping systemse2
Outcome
BCRe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
WRG-27 and WRG-56e2
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to know the influence of pigeonpea cultivars on their productivity in intercropping system under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–260
e2

“Significantly higher LER, protein yield, net returns and BCR were observed in the above intercropping systems with WRG-53 followed by WRG-27 and WRG-56”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–856

Title

Performance of Pigeqnpea cultivars in fotercropping system under Rainfed conditions in Vertisols

M. M. Reddy; B. Padmaja; Lei Rao Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 2007

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e983e9d82d4f7d46261fb7e092726244bc28d647459f6118fb777849d9bcb0a5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.