Claim · model-written summary
DPA had little effect on the other listed ethylene and respiratory factors.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- DPAe0
- Outcome
- these factorse0
- Direction
- little effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Fruit”
e0“DPA had little effect on these factors except inhibition of CTol accumulation”
Title
J. M. R. Apollo Arquiza; Anthony G. Hay; Jacqueline F. Nock; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2005. doi:10.1021/jf0511603
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect 1-MCP reduced DPA loss from apple peel, leaving 25% more DPA after 12 weeks.
- Intervention effect 1-MCP inhibited ethylene production and respiration rates with or without DPA.
- Intervention effect 1-MCP maintained low internal ethylene, alpha-farnesene, and conjugated trienol concentrations.
- Intervention effect DPA inhibited conjugated trienol accumulation.
- Intervention effect Treatment effects on peroxidase and PPO activities were inconsistent.