Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Verdict at 0.5 kg/ha with biological components suppressed Stelaria media.

A claim from Reduced rates of herbicide combined with biological components for suppressing weeds in wheat fields of Moscow, Russia · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Verdict at 0.5 kg/ha with biological components suppressed Stelaria media.

Treatment
Herbicide rate 0.5 kg/ha as a labelled-dose plus biological componentse0
Interactor
Stelaria mediae0weed
Outcome
Stelaria media populatione0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide rate 0.5 kg/ha as a labelled-dose plus biological components was favourably effective in suppressing Viola arvensis, Poaceae and Stelaria media population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–610
t0

“wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–100

Title

Reduced rates of herbicide combined with biological components for suppressing weeds in wheat fields of Moscow, Russia

Meisam Zargar; Elena N. Pakina Research on Crops 2014. doi:10.5958/2348-7542.2014.00118.1

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ea23ebd520e011efe5da60cf4dc1c6953e71d06ea3f0759309dcf2dc90664128 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

herbicide · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Both herbicides at 1/3× nearly killed wheat and eliminated yield regardless of application stage.

    Wheat Response to Simulated Drift of Glyphosate and Imazamox Applied at Two Growth Stages · 2006

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    No carryover damage was observed on wheat with any of the herbicides used.

    RESPONSE OF WHEAT PLANTS AND ACCOMPANIED WEEDS TO SOME NEW HERBICIDES ALONE OR COMBINED IN SEQUENCE · 2007

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Tillage and weed management had limited impact on aphid and beneficial insect populations.

    Insect Distribution in a Spring Pea-Winter Wheat-Spring Barley Crop Rotation System · 2000

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Adding both herbicide and fungicide to the liquid fertilizer increased the damage.

    Results from two experiments with winter wheat, comparing top-dressings of a liquid N-fertilizer either alone or with added herbicide or mildew fungicide or both, and of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ without or with the herbicide or fungicide or both · 1975 · compared with liquid fertilizer

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Metribuzin toxicity to winter wheat was harder to neutralize when metribuzin was applied preemergence.

    Inactivation of Metribuzin in Winter Wheat by Activated Carbon · 1985

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    The herbicides had no adverse effect on plant population, grain and straw yield of the succeeding wheat crop.

    Effect of herbicides on weed control and yield of kharifgroundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2016

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Preemergence metribuzin caused up to 5% wheat toxicity at 10 DAT.

    Management of herbicide resistant Phalaris minor in wheat · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Untreated wheat plots had a greater number of immature and adult syrphids than herbicide-treated plots.

    Response of aphidophagous hoverflies (Diptera, syrphidae) to herbicide in winter wheat · 2007 · compared with untreated plots

    Opposite direction

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.