Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No tillage lowered corn grain yield 5% relative to conventional tillage.

A claim from Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage lowered corn grain yield 5% relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
no-tillage systeme0
Outcome
Corn grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5%e0
Comparator
conventional tillage systeme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn grain yield decreased 5% using the no-tillage system compared with the conventional tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–850

Title

Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System

Palle Pedersen; Joseph G. Lauer Agronomy Journal 2003. doi:10.2134/agronj2003.0965

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-eac4f5bb801ac06cba5d52a3313c3417ed44a67f70c71bf64cda53224f098ef3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this claim · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.