Claim · model-written summary
Cycloate caused more visual sugarbeet injury and stand reduction than ethofumesate.
- Taxon
- sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise4 - Treatment
- Cycloatee4
- Outcome
- visual sugarbeet injury and stand reductione4
- Direction
- moree4
- Comparator
- ethofumesatee4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Cycloate ( S -ethyl N -ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate) caused more visual sugarbeet injury and stand reduction than did ethofumesate”
Title
Control of Weeds in Sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris) with Handhoeing and Herbicides
Gail A. Wicks; Robert G. Wilson Weed Science 1983. doi:10.1017/s0043174500069459
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Handweeding for 8 weeks after planting prevented sugarbeet yield losses.
- Association Weeds invading sugarbeet plots at the two-leaf stage reduced sugarbeet yields by 26%.
- Intervention effect Cycloate lowered total weed yields compared with the other herbicide.
- Intervention effect Ethofumesate applied before planting and incorporated into the soil injured sugarbeets more than when applied preemergence.
- Intervention effect Herbicides applied when sugarbeets had four to six leaves generally injured sugarbeets less than when sugarbeets had two to four leaves.
- Intervention effect Herbicides applied at four to six leaves controlled weeds less effectively than when sugarbeets had two to four leaves.
- Intervention effect No herbicide treatment was as effective as handweeding in season-long weed control.
- Association Every 1120 kg/ha of oven dry weeds corresponded to a decrease in sugarbeet root yields of 10 000 to 11 500 kg/ha.