Abstract
Sequential application of cycloate ( S -ethyl N-ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate) at 3.4 kg/ha, phenmedipham (methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate) at 1.1 kg/ha, and trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine) at 0.6 or 0.8 kg/ha, plus certain mechanical measures, controlled weeds during all periods of the growing season without significant injury to sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.). Early-season weed control was complete enough that the new selective mechanical thinners could have replaced labor for thinning. The additional labor required to bring the crop to harvest free of weeds was limited to one late-season hoeing, which required less than 10% of the total labor required in traditional weed control schedules without herbicides.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential herbicides and mechanical measures controlled weeds throughout the season.
- Taxon
- sugarbeets
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- Sequential application of cycloate ( S -ethyl N-ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate) at 3.4 kg/ha, phenmedipham (methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate) at 1.1 kg/ha, and trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine) at 0.6 or 0.8 kg/ha, plus certain mechanical measurese0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- weeds during all periods of the growing seasone0
- Direction
- controllede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sequential application of cycloate ( S -ethyl N-ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate) at 3.4 kg/ha, phenmedipham (methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate) at 1.1 kg/ha, and trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine) at 0.6 or 0.8 kg/ha, plus certain mechanical measures, controlled weeds during all periods of the growing season without significant injury to sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The sequential regime caused no significant sugarbeet injury.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Sequential application of cycloatee1
- Outcome
- injury to sugarbeetse0
- Direction
- without significante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“controlled weeds during all periods of the growing season without significant injury to sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”
t0“Full-Season Weed Control in Sugarbeets”
e1“Sequential application of cycloate”
Claim · model-written summary
Early weed control was sufficient that selective mechanical thinners could replace thinning labor.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- the new selective mechanical thinners could have replaced labor for thinninge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Early-season weed control was complete enough that the new selective mechanical thinners could have replaced labor for thinning”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Claim · model-written summary
One late hoeing required less than 10% of labor under traditional herbicide-free schedules.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- one late-season hoeinge0
- Outcome
- labor requirede0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Value
- 10%e0
- Comparator
- traditional weed control schedules without herbicidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The additional labor required to bring the crop to harvest free of weeds was limited to one late-season hoeing, which required less than 10% of the total labor required in traditional weed control schedules without herbicides”
t0“Sugarbeets”
The same questions in other papers
Cycloate · crop injury · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →trifluralin · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Cycloate · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →phenmedipham · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.