Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Low phosphate decreased root oxidative pentose phosphate pathway protein abundance.

A claim from A systems‐biology approach identifies co‐expression modules in response to low phosphate supply in maize lines of different breeding history · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low phosphate decreased root oxidative pentose phosphate pathway protein abundance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
low phosphate supplye0
Outcome
abundance of proteins in the oxidative pentose phosphate pathwaye0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In roots, low phosphate supply resulted in a decreasing abundance of proteins in the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–645
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104

Title

A systems‐biology approach identifies co‐expression modules in response to low phosphate supply in maize lines of different breeding history

Mingjie He; Xuelian Li; Melissa Mang; et al. The Plant Journal 2021. doi:10.1111/tpj.15630

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-eb45205efd2bda8528650c1e09fe2981da6974ccdd23eb7c13c800290bb26c2b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.