Intervention effectmodel-written summary

rates of brown rice increased with nitrogen application by 3.3%-4.2% at 337.5 versus 0 kg x hm(-2).

A claim from [Response of yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency to nitrogen fertilizer from mechanical transplanting super japonica rice]. · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rates of brown rice increased with nitrogen application by 3.3%-4.2% at 337.5 versus 0 kg x hm(-2).

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
rates of brown ricee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.3%-4.2%e0
Comparator
0 kg x hm(-2) N levele0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N application, the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein content of the five super japonica rice cultivars were all increased, and the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein con- tent were higher at 337.5 kg x hm(-2) N level than at 0 kg x hm(-2) N level by 3.3%-4.2%, 2.9%-6.0%, 4.4%-33.7% and 23.8%-44.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1225

Title

[Response of yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency to nitrogen fertilizer from mechanical transplanting super japonica rice].

Hai-Yan Wei; Ya-Jiang Wang; Tian-Yao Meng; et al. PubMed 2014

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-ec024709ee7efbf8899c3a0b786ab0e6b46fea7abca3ffb8fbda30826a9a44f9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.