Paper · 2014 · PubMed

[Response of yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency to nitrogen fertilizer from mechanical transplanting super japonica rice].

Hai-Yan Wei; Ya-Jiang Wang; Tian-Yao Meng; et al.

17
claims
24
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Five super japonica rice cultivars were grown by mechanical transplanting in field and seven N treatments with total N application rate of 0, 150, 187.5, 225, 262.5, 300 and 337.5 kg x hm(-2) respectively were adopted to study the effects of N rate on rice yield, quality and N use efficiency. The differences between N requirement for obtaining the highest yield and for achieving the best economic benefit were compared. With the increase of N fertilizer rate, the yields of five super japonica rice cultivars increased firstly and then descended, achieving the highest yield at the N level of 300 kg x hm(-2) ranging from 10.33-10.60 kg x hm(-2). Yield increase mainly attributed to the large number of spikelet, for the total spikelet number of each rice cultivar reached the maximum value at the 300 kg x hm(-2) N level. With the increase of N application, the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein content of the five super japonica rice cultivars were all increased, and the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein con- tent were higher at 337.5 kg x hm(-2) N level than at 0 kg x hm(-2) N level by 3.3%-4.2%, 2.9%-6.0%, 4.4%-33.7% and 23.8%-44.3%, respectively. While the amylose content, gel consistency and taste value of the five rice cultivars were all decreased, and the amylose content, gel consistency and taste value were lower at 337.5 kg x hm(-2) N level than at 0 kg x hm(-2) N level by 12.4%-38.9%, 10.3%-28.5% and 20.3%-29.7%, respectively. The chalkiness increased firstly and then decreased while the change of chalky rate varied with the cultivars. With the increase of N application, the N use efficiency, agronomic N use efficiency and physiological N use efficiency decreased while the N uptake of grain increased significantly. If the cost of N fertilizer was taken into account, the N fertilizer amount to obtain the optimal economic benefits would be 275.68 kg x hm(-2) with the corresponding yield of 9.97 t x hm(-2). Therefore, in the existing super rice production, classified management of N fertilizer would be required to meet differentiated demands of high yield, good quality, high efficiency, low N fertilizer input and so on.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yields first increased and then declined as nitrogen rate rose, peaking at 300 kg x hm(-2) with 10.33-10.60 kg x hm(-2).

Treatment
N fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increased firstly and then descendede0
Value
10.33-10.60 kg x hm(-2)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N fertilizer rate, the yields of five super japonica rice cultivars increased firstly and then descended, achieving the highest yield at the N level of 300 kg x hm(-2) ranging from 10.33-10.60 kg x hm(-2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice spikelet number was highest at 300 kg x hm(-2) nitrogen.

Treatment
N levele0
Outcome
total spikelet numbere0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total spikelet number of each rice cultivar reached the maximum value at the 300 kg x hm(-2) N level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rates of brown rice increased with nitrogen application by 3.3%-4.2% at 337.5 versus 0 kg x hm(-2).

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
rates of brown ricee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.3%-4.2%e0
Comparator
0 kg x hm(-2) N levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N application, the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein content of the five super japonica rice cultivars were all increased, and the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein con- tent were higher at 337.5 kg x hm(-2) N level than at 0 kg x hm(-2) N level by 3.3%-4.2%, 2.9%-6.0%, 4.4%-33.7% and 23.8%-44.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

milled rice increased with nitrogen application by 2.9%-6.0% at 337.5 versus 0 kg x hm(-2).

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
milled ricee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.9%-6.0%e0
Comparator
0 kg x hm(-2) N levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N application, the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein content of the five super japonica rice cultivars were all increased, and the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein con- tent were higher at 337.5 kg x hm(-2) N level than at 0 kg x hm(-2) N level by 3.3%-4.2%, 2.9%-6.0%, 4.4%-33.7% and 23.8%-44.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

head milled rice increased with nitrogen application by 4.4%-33.7% at 337.5 versus 0 kg x hm(-2).

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
head milled ricee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.4%-33.7%e0
Comparator
0 kg x hm(-2) N levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N application, the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein content of the five super japonica rice cultivars were all increased, and the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein con- tent were higher at 337.5 kg x hm(-2) N level than at 0 kg x hm(-2) N level by 3.3%-4.2%, 2.9%-6.0%, 4.4%-33.7% and 23.8%-44.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

protein content increased with nitrogen application by 23.8%-44.3% at 337.5 versus 0 kg x hm(-2).

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23.8%-44.3%e0
Comparator
0 kg x hm(-2) N levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N application, the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein content of the five super japonica rice cultivars were all increased, and the rates of brown rice, milled rice, head milled rice and the protein con- tent were higher at 337.5 kg x hm(-2) N level than at 0 kg x hm(-2) N level by 3.3%-4.2%, 2.9%-6.0%, 4.4%-33.7% and 23.8%-44.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

amylose content decreased with nitrogen application by 12.4%-38.9% at 337.5 versus 0 kg x hm(-2).

Treatment
N levele0
Outcome
amylose contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
12.4%-38.9%e0
Comparator
0 kg x hm(-2) N levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the amylose content, gel consistency and taste value of the five rice cultivars were all decreased, and the amylose content, gel consistency and taste value were lower at 337.5 kg x hm(-2) N level than at 0 kg x hm(-2) N level by 12.4%-38.9%, 10.3%-28.5% and 20.3%-29.7%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

gel consistency decreased with nitrogen application by 10.3%-28.5% at 337.5 versus 0 kg x hm(-2).

Treatment
N levele0
Outcome
gel consistencye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
10.3%-28.5%e0
Comparator
0 kg x hm(-2) N levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the amylose content, gel consistency and taste value of the five rice cultivars were all decreased, and the amylose content, gel consistency and taste value were lower at 337.5 kg x hm(-2) N level than at 0 kg x hm(-2) N level by 12.4%-38.9%, 10.3%-28.5% and 20.3%-29.7%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

taste value decreased with nitrogen application by 20.3%-29.7% at 337.5 versus 0 kg x hm(-2).

Treatment
N levele0
Outcome
taste valuee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
20.3%-29.7%e0
Comparator
0 kg x hm(-2) N levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the amylose content, gel consistency and taste value of the five rice cultivars were all decreased, and the amylose content, gel consistency and taste value were lower at 337.5 kg x hm(-2) N level than at 0 kg x hm(-2) N level by 12.4%-38.9%, 10.3%-28.5% and 20.3%-29.7%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1517 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice chalkiness first increased and then decreased.

Outcome
chalkinesse0
Direction
increased firstly and then decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chalkiness increased firstly and then decreased while the change of chalky rate varied with the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Change in rice chalky rate varied among cultivars.

Outcome
change of chalky ratee0
Direction
variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chalkiness increased firstly and then decreased while the change of chalky rate varied with the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N use efficiency decreased as nitrogen application increased.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N application, the N use efficiency, agronomic N use efficiency and physiological N use efficiency decreased while the N uptake of grain increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

agronomic N use efficiency decreased as nitrogen application increased.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
agronomic N use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N application, the N use efficiency, agronomic N use efficiency and physiological N use efficiency decreased while the N uptake of grain increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

physiological N use efficiency decreased as nitrogen application increased.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
physiological N use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N application, the N use efficiency, agronomic N use efficiency and physiological N use efficiency decreased while the N uptake of grain increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake of grain increased as nitrogen application increased.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
N uptake of graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N application, the N use efficiency, agronomic N use efficiency and physiological N use efficiency decreased while the N uptake of grain increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Accounting for fertilizer cost, optimal economic benefit was estimated at 275.68 kg x hm(-2) nitrogen and a yield of 9.97 t x hm(-2).

Outcome
optimal economic benefitse0
Value
275.68 kg x hm(-2)e0
Qualifier
9.97 t x hm(-2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If the cost of N fertilizer was taken into account, the N fertilizer amount to obtain the optimal economic benefits would be 275.68 kg x hm(-2) with the corresponding yield of 9.97 t x hm(-2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–2004 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–128 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend differentiated nitrogen management to balance rice yield, quality, efficiency, and input.

Outcome
classified management of N fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, in the existing super rice production, classified management of N fertilizer would be required to meet differentiated demands of high yield, good quality, high efficiency, low N fertilizer input and so on.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2221 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

100 papers: 89 positive, 11 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 40 positive, 17 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 46 positive, 15 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.