Paper · 1993 · Agronomy Journal

Fallow and Sesbania Effects on Response of Transplanted Lowland Rice to Urea

R. J. Buresh; D. P. Garrity; E. G. Castillo; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Although lowland soils in Asia are frequently fallowed between rice ( Oryza sativa L.) crops, little is known about the effects of fallow management on N cycling and growth of a subsequent lowland rice crop. A 2‐yr field study was conducted in the Philippines on a Typic Tropaquept to determine the interactive effects of pre‐rice land management and urea fertilization on rice growth, N uptake, and response to applied N. Management treatments before transplanting wet‐season rice were (i) weedy fallow (WF), (ii) weed‐free fallow (WFF), and (iii) Sesbania rostrata Bremek. & Oberm. grown in situ for either 45 or 60 d as green manure (SR). Weeds and S. rostrata were incorporated after soil flooding on 23 June of each year, and rice was transplanted on 30 June 1989 and 4 July 1990. Four rates of urea‐N (0, 40, 80, and 120 kg N ha ‐1 ) were applied to rice following each pre‐rice treatment. The efficiency of added N with respect to dry matter accumulation (kg dry wt. kg −1 N applied) was reduced following WF and SR compared with that following WFF at 45 d after transplanting (DAT), about 10 to 15 d after panicle initiation. Rice recovered from the initial adverse effect of incorporated plant residue, and growth rate after 45 DAT was greater following SR and WF than that following WFF. Grain yield without applied urea was 0.9 Mg ha ‐1 higher following WF than that following WFF. Incorporated weed‐N (35 kg N ha ‐1 ) substituted for 40 kg urea‐N ha ‐1 . High initial rice growth rate in the absence of incorporated plant residue (WFF) resulted in a lower rice N concentration at 45 DAT. Incorporated S. rostrata and weeds continued to provide N to rice after 45 DAT. When no plant residues were incorporated (WFF), the application of only one‐third of the total urea‐N at panicle initiation was insufficient to meet the N requirements of rice. Basal urea‐N (two‐thirds of the total urea‐N) failed to increase rice dry weight or N concentration at 21 DAT following all pre‐rice treatments. Results suggest that optimal distribution of urea among application timings might depend on whether plant residues are incorporated before transplanting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WF reduced added-N efficiency for dry matter accumulation relative to WFF.

Treatment
WFe0
Outcome
efficiency of added Ne0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
WFFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The efficiency of added N with respect to dry matter accumulation (kg dry wt. kg −1 N applied) was reduced following WF and SR compared with that following WFF at 45 d after transplanting (DAT), about 10 to 15 d after panicle initiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SR reduced added-N efficiency for dry matter accumulation relative to WFF.

Treatment
SRe0
Outcome
efficiency of added Ne0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
WFFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The efficiency of added N with respect to dry matter accumulation (kg dry wt. kg −1 N applied) was reduced following WF and SR compared with that following WFF at 45 d after transplanting (DAT), about 10 to 15 d after panicle initiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice recovered from an initial adverse effect of incorporated plant residue.

Outcome
recoverede0
Direction
recoverede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rice recovered from the initial adverse effect of incorporated plant residue, and growth rate after 45 DAT was greater following SR and WF than that following WFF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice growth rate after 45 DAT was greater after SR than WFF.

Treatment
SRe0
Outcome
growth ratee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
WFFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rice recovered from the initial adverse effect of incorporated plant residue, and growth rate after 45 DAT was greater following SR and WF than that following WFF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice growth rate after 45 DAT was greater after WF than WFF.

Treatment
WFe0
Outcome
growth ratee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
WFFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rice recovered from the initial adverse effect of incorporated plant residue, and growth rate after 45 DAT was greater following SR and WF than that following WFF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without urea, WF increased grain yield over WFF by 0.9 Mg ha ‐1.

Treatment
WFe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.9 Mg ha ‐1e0
Comparator
WFFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield without applied urea was 0.9 Mg ha ‐1 higher following WF than that following WFF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated weed N substituted for 40 kg urea N per hectare.

Treatment
Incorporated weed‐N (35 kg N ha ‐1 )e0
Outcome
substitutede0
Direction
substitutede0
Value
40 kg urea‐N ha ‐1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Incorporated weed‐N (35 kg N ha ‐1 ) substituted for 40 kg urea‐N ha ‐1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WFF produced lower rice N concentration at 45 DAT.

Treatment
WFFe0
Outcome
rice N concentratione0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“High initial rice growth rate in the absence of incorporated plant residue (WFF) resulted in a lower rice N concentration at 45 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated S. rostrata continued to provide N after 45 DAT.

Treatment
S. rostratae0
Outcome
provide N to ricee0
Direction
continuede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Incorporated S. rostrata and weeds continued to provide N to rice after 45 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated weeds continued to provide N after 45 DAT.

Treatment
weedse0
Outcome
provide N to ricee0
Direction
continuede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Incorporated S. rostrata and weeds continued to provide N to rice after 45 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One third of urea N at panicle initiation was insufficient without incorporated residues.

Treatment
application of only one‐third of the total urea‐N at panicle initiatione0
Outcome
N requirements of ricee0
Direction
insufficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“When no plant residues were incorporated (WFF), the application of only one‐third of the total urea‐N at panicle initiation was insufficient to meet the N requirements of rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal urea N failed to increase rice dry weight at 21 DAT.

Treatment
Basal urea‐N (two‐thirds of the total urea‐N)e0
Outcome
rice dry weighte0
Direction
failed to increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Basal urea‐N (two‐thirds of the total urea‐N) failed to increase rice dry weight or N concentration at 21 DAT following all pre‐rice treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–2010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal urea N failed to increase N concentration at 21 DAT.

Treatment
Basal urea‐N (two‐thirds of the total urea‐N)e0
Outcome
N concentratione0
Direction
failed to increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Basal urea‐N (two‐thirds of the total urea‐N) failed to increase rice dry weight or N concentration at 21 DAT following all pre‐rice treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–2010 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal timing of urea application may depend on pretransplant residue incorporation.

Outcome
optimal distribution of urea among application timingse0
Qualifier
whether plant residues are incorporated before transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results suggest that optimal distribution of urea among application timings might depend on whether plant residues are incorporated before transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2011–2164 · show in text ↑

rotation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

rotation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

nitrogen · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

rotation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 72 positive, 14 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 409 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.