Claim · model-written summary
Greengage growth rate did not differ significantly between mixed and single virus infections.
- Taxon
- Greengage
Prunus domestica subsp. italicat0 - Treatment
- plum line pattern, apple chlorotic leaf spot, and Prunus necrotic ringspot virusese0
- Outcome
- growth ratee0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- Prunus necrotic ringspot virus alonee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was no significant difference in growth rate between trees infected with plum line pattern, apple chlorotic leaf spot, and Prunus necrotic ringspot viruses, and trees infected with Prunus necrotic ringspot virus alone.”
t0“Greengage”
Title
Effect of virus infection on growth and cropping of Greengage and Billington plum trees
G. A. Wood; P. R. Fry New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 1984. doi:10.1080/00288233.1984.10418019
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Virus infection reduced Greengage yield by 20% over eight years.
- Intervention effect The three-virus combination with the line pattern strain adversely affected Billington growth rate.
- Intervention effect Either plum line pattern strain with the other two viruses significantly reduced Billington yield.
- Intervention effect Single Prunus necrotic ringspot infection did not affect Billington yield.
- Intervention effect Single apple chlorotic leaf spot infection did not affect Billington yield.
- Intervention effect Prunus necrotic ringspot with prune dwarf viruses did not affect Billington yield.