Intervention effectmodel-written summary

HA+Fe was the best treatment for overall growth, yield and edible-part Fe accumulation in lettuce.

A claim from Foliar Application of Humic Acid with Fe Supplement Improved Rice, Soybean, and Lettuce Iron Fortification · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HA+Fe was the best treatment for overall growth, yield and edible-part Fe accumulation in lettuce.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
HA+Fee5
Outcome
overall plant growth, yield, and Fe accumulation in the edible partse5
Direction
beste5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Foliar Application of Humic Acid with Fe Supplement Improved Rice, Soybean, and Lettuce Iron Fortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106
e5

“HA+Fe was identified as the best treatment in terms of improving overall plant growth, yield, and Fe accumulation in the edible parts of all three crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1061

Title

Foliar Application of Humic Acid with Fe Supplement Improved Rice, Soybean, and Lettuce Iron Fortification

Sandeep Sharma; Neha Anand; Prem S. Bindraban; et al. Agriculture 2023. doi:10.3390/agriculture13010132

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-ec412fefbf87d9d15c945357ccecd3d4cf23e1f391447ad8a4ccda129c4c918f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

iron atom · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.