Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GLT traps captured 52% of moths, exceeding delta and water traps.

A claim from EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT TRAP TYPES FOR ATTRACTING TOMATO LEAF MOTH Tuta absoluta UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GLT traps captured 52% of moths, exceeding delta and water traps.

Treatment
GLT trape0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
total mothse0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
52%e0
Comparator
delta and water trapse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO LEAF MOTH Tuta absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–80
e0

“The GLT trap demonstrated remarkable superiority over other trap types, capturing 52% of the total moths, significantly differing from the delta and water traps, which captured 37% and 11%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1254

Title

EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT TRAP TYPES FOR ATTRACTING TOMATO LEAF MOTH Tuta absoluta UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS

Mohammed Saeed Mirza; Shamal Abdullah Al-Mufti Mağallaẗ zirāʿaẗ al-rāfidayn 2024. doi:10.33899/mja.2024.144676.1327

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-ecc52be44f63fdbe632f201b41835613464869ac29fd3965be856881af3c5d01 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

trap barrier · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.