Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional NPK increased nitrogen content to 1.972% versus control.

A claim from Effect of Nano and non-Nano NPK Fertilizers on growth, Yield and Quality of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. Italica) Grown under Covered and Un Covered Conditions. · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional NPK increased nitrogen content to 1.972% versus control.

Treatment
non-Nano NPKe0
Outcome
nitrogen contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.972%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. Italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–117
e0

“significant impact of non-Nano NPK on the parameters and only the traits higher plant (62.90 cm), head diameter (35.89 cm) vitamin C (35.89) fiber content (2.13%)andnitrogen content (1.972%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1461

Title

Effect of Nano and non-Nano NPK Fertilizers on growth, Yield and Quality of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. Italica) Grown under Covered and Un Covered Conditions.

SANAA M.S RASHEED African Journal of Biological Sciences 2024. doi:10.48047/afjbs.6.5.2024.7715-7733

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-ed3e4fd3bb39ff0953d5103d4bea654301ce02c78b79b29aede9a162564c43f6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 20 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 127 positive, 19 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.