Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano NPK increased phenol content to 0.83%.

A claim from Effect of Nano and non-Nano NPK Fertilizers on growth, Yield and Quality of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. Italica) Grown under Covered and Un Covered Conditions. · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano NPK increased phenol content to 0.83%.

Treatment
nano-fertilizer at a concentration of 6 g.l-1e0
Outcome
phenol contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.83 %e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. Italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–117
e0

“nano-fertilizer at a concentration of 6 g.l-1 significantly increased most of parameters number of leaves to (20.61leaf plant-1), leaf area (612.66 cm), head weight (698.89 g), total yield (41.00 t.ha-1, head diameter (32.94 cm) vitamin C (35.83) phenol content (0.83 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1131

Title

Effect of Nano and non-Nano NPK Fertilizers on growth, Yield and Quality of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. Italica) Grown under Covered and Un Covered Conditions.

SANAA M.S RASHEED African Journal of Biological Sciences 2024. doi:10.48047/afjbs.6.5.2024.7715-7733

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e3c098ae8dc65883141f2bc023413e37f69c1f060d69022bd41a411b5c8a7250 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.