Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano calcium increased fruit calcium and protein.

A claim from Influence of preharvest nano calcium applications on postharvest of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum) · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano calcium increased fruit calcium and protein.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Nano calciume0
Outcome
calcium and proteine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano calcium treated fruits had lower levels of total soluble solids, pH, weight loss, carotenoids, electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation and higher levels of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll, calcium and protein compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1185
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80

Title

Influence of preharvest nano calcium applications on postharvest of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum)

FARIBA AMINI; LADAN BAYAT; SHIMA HOSSEINKHANI Nusantara Bioscience 2016. doi:10.13057/nusbiosci/n080213

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-ed6dd98f2d2e47d0b88bc3323987cdb1566606187e3f0beb7226d282ca91efc0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · quality: protein · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: protein · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.