Paper · 2016 · Nusantara Bioscience

Influence of preharvest nano calcium applications on postharvest of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum)

FARIBA AMINI; LADAN BAYAT; SHIMA HOSSEINKHANI

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract. Amini F, Bayat L, Hosseinkhani S. 2016. Influence of preharvest nano calcium applications on postharvest of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum). Nusantara Bioscience 8: 215-220. The effect of preharvest nano calcium treatment on the quality, physicochemical parameters and antioxidative enzyme activities of sweet pepper fruits were evaluated. For this purpose, sweet pepper plants treated with three concentrations (0, 4 and 8 g/L) of nano calcium in five steps (50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 days after pepper planting). 100 days after pepper planting, fruits were harvested and packaged in plastic bags and stored at 20±3 0C, then total soluble solids, pH, weight loss, carotenoids, electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation, titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll, calcium, protein and the activities of total antioxidant enzymes, catalase, and guaiacol peroxidase were evaluated at 0, 7, 14 and 21 days of storage period. Nano calcium treated fruits had lower levels of total soluble solids, pH, weight loss, carotenoids, electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation and higher levels of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll, calcium and protein compared to the control plants. The increase percentage of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls, calcium and protein contents in plants treated with 4 g/L nano calcium and 21 days storage period were calculated 68.86%, 41.89%, 81.17%, 78.57%, 80.81%, 21.46% and 83.30% respectively. The maximum activities of total antioxidant enzymes, catalase and guailcol peroxidase were observed in 21 days control plants that application of nano calcium decreased these antioxidant activities. In most parameters 4 g/L concentration was more effective. Therefore, commercial application of preharvest nano calcium (4 g/L) can be considered for the maintenance of quality of sweet peppers during storage and marketing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano calcium lowered soluble solids, pH and weight loss.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Nano calciume0
Outcome
total soluble solids, pH, weight losse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano calcium treated fruits had lower levels of total soluble solids, pH, weight loss, carotenoids, electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation and higher levels of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll, calcium and protein compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano calcium lowered carotenoids, electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Nano calciume0
Outcome
carotenoids, electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano calcium treated fruits had lower levels of total soluble solids, pH, weight loss, carotenoids, electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation and higher levels of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll, calcium and protein compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano calcium increased titrable acidity, ascorbic acid and chlorophyll.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Nano calciume0
Outcome
titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano calcium treated fruits had lower levels of total soluble solids, pH, weight loss, carotenoids, electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation and higher levels of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll, calcium and protein compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano calcium increased fruit calcium and protein.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Nano calciume0
Outcome
calcium and proteine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano calcium treated fruits had lower levels of total soluble solids, pH, weight loss, carotenoids, electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation and higher levels of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll, calcium and protein compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 g/L and day 21 titrable acidity increased 68.86%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
4 g/L nano calciume0
Outcome
titrable aciditye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
68.86%e0
Qualifier
21 days storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase percentage of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls, calcium and protein contents in plants treated with 4 g/L nano calcium and 21 days storage period were calculated 68.86%, 41.89%, 81.17%, 78.57%, 80.81%, 21.46% and 83.30% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 g/L and day 21 ascorbic acid increased 41.89%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
4 g/L nano calciume0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
increasee0
Value
41.89%e0
Qualifier
21 days storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase percentage of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls, calcium and protein contents in plants treated with 4 g/L nano calcium and 21 days storage period were calculated 68.86%, 41.89%, 81.17%, 78.57%, 80.81%, 21.46% and 83.30% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 g/L and day 21 chlorophyll a increased 81.17%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
4 g/L nano calciume0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
increasee0
Value
81.17%e0
Qualifier
21 days storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase percentage of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls, calcium and protein contents in plants treated with 4 g/L nano calcium and 21 days storage period were calculated 68.86%, 41.89%, 81.17%, 78.57%, 80.81%, 21.46% and 83.30% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 g/L and day 21 chlorophyll b increased 78.57%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
4 g/L nano calciume0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
increasee0
Value
78.57%e0
Qualifier
21 days storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase percentage of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls, calcium and protein contents in plants treated with 4 g/L nano calcium and 21 days storage period were calculated 68.86%, 41.89%, 81.17%, 78.57%, 80.81%, 21.46% and 83.30% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 g/L and day 21 total chlorophyll increased 80.81%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
4 g/L nano calciume0
Outcome
total chlorophyllse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
80.81%e0
Qualifier
21 days storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase percentage of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls, calcium and protein contents in plants treated with 4 g/L nano calcium and 21 days storage period were calculated 68.86%, 41.89%, 81.17%, 78.57%, 80.81%, 21.46% and 83.30% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 g/L and day 21 calcium increased 21.46%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
4 g/L nano calciume0
Outcome
calciume0
Direction
increasee0
Value
21.46%e0
Qualifier
21 days storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase percentage of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls, calcium and protein contents in plants treated with 4 g/L nano calcium and 21 days storage period were calculated 68.86%, 41.89%, 81.17%, 78.57%, 80.81%, 21.46% and 83.30% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 g/L and day 21 protein increased 83.30%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
4 g/L nano calciume0
Outcome
protein contentse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
83.30%e0
Qualifier
21 days storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase percentage of titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls, calcium and protein contents in plants treated with 4 g/L nano calcium and 21 days storage period were calculated 68.86%, 41.89%, 81.17%, 78.57%, 80.81%, 21.46% and 83.30% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano calcium decreased antioxidant enzyme activities from the day-21 control maxima.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
nano calciume0
Outcome
total antioxidant enzymes, catalase and guailcol peroxidasee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
21 days control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum activities of total antioxidant enzymes, catalase and guailcol peroxidase were observed in 21 days control plants that application of nano calcium decreased these antioxidant activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1680 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4 g/L concentration was more effective for most parameters.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
4 g/L concentratione0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most parameters 4 g/L concentration was more effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1739 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommended 4 g/L preharvest nano calcium to maintain stored pepper quality.

Taxon
sweet peppersCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
preharvest nano calcium (4 g/L)e0
Outcome
maintenance of quality of sweet pepperse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“commercial application of preharvest nano calcium (4 g/L) can be considered for the maintenance of quality of sweet peppers during storage and marketing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1903 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · molecular: metabolites · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · quality: protein · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium atom · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium atom · physiology: pigments · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium atom · quality: sugar starch · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: protein · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.