Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Normal intercropping maximized B:C ratio at 4.8, matching paired intercropping and exceeding sole pigeonpea.

A claim from Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of rainfed pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and blackgram (Vigna mungo) intercropping system · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal intercropping maximized B:C ratio at 4.8, matching paired intercropping and exceeding sole pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
normal intercropping system (S2)e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.8e0
Qualifier
at par with paired intercropping system (S3)e0
Comparator
sole planting of pigeonpea (S1)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“normal intercropping system (S2) gave maximum values of gross return (Rupees 120 050), net return (Rupees 99 396), B:C ratio (4.8), pigeonpea equivalent yield (21.75 q/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.70), production efficiency (7.98 kg/ha/day) and economic efficiency (364.83 Rupees/ha/day) which was at par with paired intercropping system (S3) and significantly superior to sole planting of pigeonpea (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–1105

Title

Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of rainfed pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and blackgram (Vigna mungo) intercropping system

NARENDRA KUMAWAT; RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH; RAKESH KUMAR; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2015. doi:10.56093/ijas.v85i2.46474

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-ed8bd64b4e5c4a3c003159d37a98c3a49f0275b23c47e9b81923e886edd6d2c1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.