Claim · model-written summary
Storage at 1% O2 and 1% CO2 gave no difference in apple quality compared with 2% O2 and 3% CO2.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- 1% O 2 and 1% CO 2e4
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye4
- Direction
- no differencee4
- Comparator
- 2% O 2 and 3% CO 2e4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“QUALITY OF ‘GALA’ APPLES AS INFLUENCED BY HARVEST MATURITY, STORAGE ATMOSPHERE AND CONCOMITANT STORAGE WITH ‘BARTLETT’ PEARS1”
e4“There was no difference in fruit quality between fruit stored at 1% O 2 and 1% CO 2 compared with fruit stored in 2% O 2 and 3% CO 2”
Title
S.R. DRAKE; T.A. EISELE Journal of Food Quality 1997. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4557.1997.tb00450.x
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Controlled atmosphere storage reduced quality losses of Gala apples compared with regular atmosphere storage.
- Intervention effect Controlled atmosphere storage reduced quality losses of Bartlett pears compared with regular atmosphere storage.
- Intervention effect Apples stored in CA were firmer than apples from RA storage.
- Intervention effect Apples stored in CA had higher acidity than apples from RA storage.
- Intervention effect Apples stored in CA had less color change than apples from RA storage.
- Intervention effect Apples stored together with pears in CA maintained good quality and compared favorably with apples stored separately.
- Intervention effect Pears stored together with apples in CA maintained good quality and compared favorably with pears stored separately.
- Intervention effect Apples harvested at a more advanced maturity deteriorated more quickly in storage than earlier harvested apples.
- Intervention effect Apples given 45 days in CA followed by 30 days RA were superior in quality to apples stored 75 days in RA alone.