Claim · model-written summary
Pears stored together with apples in CA maintained good quality and compared favorably with pears stored separately.
- Treatment
- stored together in CAe3
- Outcome
- good qualitye3
- Direction
- compared favorablye3
- Comparator
- apples or pears stored separatelye3
PyrusNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“QUALITY OF ‘GALA’ APPLES AS INFLUENCED BY HARVEST MATURITY, STORAGE ATMOSPHERE AND CONCOMITANT STORAGE WITH ‘BARTLETT’ PEARS1”
e3“Apples and pears stored together in CA maintained good quality and compared favorably with apples or pears stored separately”
Title
S.R. DRAKE; T.A. EISELE Journal of Food Quality 1997. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4557.1997.tb00450.x
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Controlled atmosphere storage reduced quality losses of Gala apples compared with regular atmosphere storage.
- Intervention effect Controlled atmosphere storage reduced quality losses of Bartlett pears compared with regular atmosphere storage.
- Intervention effect Apples stored in CA were firmer than apples from RA storage.
- Intervention effect Apples stored in CA had higher acidity than apples from RA storage.
- Intervention effect Apples stored in CA had less color change than apples from RA storage.
- Intervention effect Apples stored together with pears in CA maintained good quality and compared favorably with apples stored separately.
- Intervention effect Storage at 1% O2 and 1% CO2 gave no difference in apple quality compared with 2% O2 and 3% CO2.
- Intervention effect Apples harvested at a more advanced maturity deteriorated more quickly in storage than earlier harvested apples.
- Intervention effect Apples given 45 days in CA followed by 30 days RA were superior in quality to apples stored 75 days in RA alone.