Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The coating improved pear storage and sensory quality relative to uncoated fruit.

A claim from Effects of modified sweet potato starch edible coating incorporated with cumin essential oil on storage quality of ‘early crisp’ · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating improved pear storage and sensory quality relative to uncoated fruit.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Treatment
antifungal edible coatinge0
Outcome
storage quality of the pearse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
uncoated samplese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the antifungal edible coating improved the storage quality of the pears and maintained consumable and better sensory quality compared to uncoated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–892

Title

Effects of modified sweet potato starch edible coating incorporated with cumin essential oil on storage quality of ‘early crisp’

William Oyom; Hengping Xu; Zhitian Liu; et al. LWT 2021. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112475

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5f0d111efaa546dc65698a2de977bca598b9a3c65db58768215f54d00d289f2e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

storage · quality: general · Pyrus (pears)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Prolonged storage in controlled atmospheres did not cause undesirable flavor effects when pears were canned.

    Further Studies on Controlled Atmosphere Storage of ‘Bartlett’ Pears1 · 1973

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    During cold storage, the 5% CNC coating was competitive with Semperfresh for delaying quality deterioration.

    Cellulose Nanocrystal Reinforced Chitosan Coatings for Improving the Storability of Postharvest Pears Under Both Ambient and Cold Storages · 2017 · compared with Semperfresh™

    Same direction

  3. positive
    PE + 0.2% SB + 1% N-AC received the highest sensory scores through 12 days.

    Pectin-Based Edible Coating Combined with Chemical Dips Containing Antimicrobials and Antibrowning Agents to Maintain Quality of Fresh-Cut Pears · 2022

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Pears stored together with apples in CA maintained good quality and compared favorably with pears stored separately.

    QUALITY OF ‘GALA’ APPLES AS INFLUENCED BY HARVEST MATURITY, STORAGE ATMOSPHERE AND CONCOMITANT STORAGE WITH ‘BARTLETT’ PEARS1 · 1997 · compared with apples or pears stored separately

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Kafirin coating extended the eat-ripe quality of the pears by 1-2 weeks.

    Effect of kafirin protein coating on sensory quality and shelf‐life of ‘Packham's Triumph’ pears during ripening · 2011

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Modified atmosphere bags improved pear quality relative to normal packaging in regular atmosphere storage.

    QUALITY OF MODIFIED ATMOSPHERE PACKAGED “BARTLETT” PEARS AS INFLUENCED BY TIME AND TYPE OF STORAGE · 2005 · compared with normally packed pears stored only in RA storage

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Pears in charcoal-processed packaging had significantly higher quality than pears in conventional packaging.

    Effects of Packaging Materials Processed with Oak Charcoal on the Quality of Oriental Pears during Storage and Distribution · 2010 · compared with conventional packaging materials

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Sweating before storage improved fruit quality.

    Experiments on the Storage of Tung-Kuo Pears grown in Lanchow · 1957

    Same direction

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.