Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The maize–turmeric–wheat–linseed sequence had highest production efficiency of 77.41 kg/day/ha.

A claim from Bio-intensive complementary cropping systems to revitalize sustainability and profitability in Punjab agriculture · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maize–turmeric–wheat–linseed sequence had highest production efficiency of 77.41 kg/day/ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow)e0
Outcome
production efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
77.41 kg/day/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow) gave highest production efficiency (77.41 kg/day/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–715

Title

Bio-intensive complementary cropping systems to revitalize sustainability and profitability in Punjab agriculture

S.S. Walia; C.S. Aulakh; Vikrant Dhawan; et al. Indian Journal of Economics and Development 2017. doi:10.5958/2322-0430.2017.00101.9

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-eeba75dec0b2a51dee0ad27cc5325383ba1a0f4b635f5386915df12c899b59a7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 83 positive, 19 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
    Winter annual forage reduced subsequent corn yield.

    Integrating a Double‐Cropped Winter Annual Forage into a Corn‐Soybean Rotation · 2002 · compared with treatments thatdid not have a double‐crop winter annual forage

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Curcuma longa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this claim · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,007 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.