Paper · 2017 · Indian Journal of Economics and Development

Bio-intensive complementary cropping systems to revitalize sustainability and profitability in Punjab agriculture

S.S. Walia; C.S. Aulakh; Vikrant Dhawan; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effect of twelve crop sequences on productivity, profitability and water use efficiency. The results elucidated maximum rice equivalent yield for the cropping system of maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow) (282.6 q/ha) which was followed by maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-barley (bed) + linseed (furrow) (264.4 q/ha), and basmati rice-radish-spring maize (237.4 q/ha) cropping systems. These cropping systems produced an additional rice equivalent yield of 107 to 152 q/ha and saved 10 to 165 cm irrigation water over the rice-wheat system. Maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow) gave highest production efficiency (77.41 kg/day/ha), net returns (2, 89, 483/ha) and proved to be a viable option to avail higher profitability for farmers in Punjab.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maize–turmeric–wheat–linseed sequence had maximum rice equivalent yield of 282.6 q/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow)e0
Outcome
rice equivalent yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
282.6 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum rice equivalent yield for the cropping system of maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow) (282.6 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maize–turmeric–barley–linseed sequence yielded 264.4 q/ha rice equivalent, ranking next.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-barley (bed) + linseed (furrow)e0
Outcome
rice equivalent yielde1
Value
264.4 q/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was followed by maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-barley (bed) + linseed (furrow) (264.4 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum rice equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The basmati rice–radish–spring maize sequence yielded 237.4 q/ha rice equivalent.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
basmati rice-radish-spring maizee0
Outcome
rice equivalent yielde1
Value
237.4 q/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“and basmati rice-radish-spring maize (237.4 q/ha) cropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–444 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum rice equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three highlighted cropping systems produced 107 to 152 q/ha additional rice equivalent yield over rice–wheat.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
These cropping systemse0
Outcome
rice equivalent yielde0
Direction
additionale0
Value
107 to 152 q/hae0
Comparator
rice-wheat systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These cropping systems produced an additional rice equivalent yield of 107 to 152 q/ha and saved 10 to 165 cm irrigation water over the rice-wheat system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–599 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-barley (bed) + linseed (furrow) (264.4 q/ha), and basmati rice-radish-spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highlighted cropping systems saved 10 to 165 cm irrigation water over rice–wheat.

Treatment
These cropping systemse0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savede0
Value
10 to 165 cme0
Comparator
rice-wheat systeme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“These cropping systems produced an additional rice equivalent yield of 107 to 152 q/ha and saved 10 to 165 cm irrigation water over the rice-wheat system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maize–turmeric–wheat–linseed sequence had highest production efficiency of 77.41 kg/day/ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow)e0
Outcome
production efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
77.41 kg/day/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow) gave highest production efficiency (77.41 kg/day/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maize–turmeric–wheat–linseed sequence had highest net returns of 2, 89, 483/ha.

Treatment
Maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow)e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2, 89, 483/hae0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow) gave highest production efficiency (77.41 kg/day/ha), net returns (2, 89, 483/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–744 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify the maize–turmeric–wheat–linseed sequence as a viable option for greater profitability in Punjab.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow)e0
Outcome
viable option to avail higher profitabilitye0
Setting
Punjabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (furrow) + turmeric (bed)-wheat (bed) + linseed (furrow) gave highest production efficiency (77.41 kg/day/ha), net returns (2, 89, 483/ha) and proved to be a viable option to avail higher profitability for farmers in Punjab.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–830 · show in text ↑

Hordeum vulgare · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 83 positive, 19 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Curcuma longa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cultivation system · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 110 positive, 45 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.