Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping had no significant effect on cowpea seeds per pod or seed weight.

A claim from Effects of Intercropping on the Performance of Maize and Cowpeas in Botswana · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping had no significant effect on cowpea seeds per pod or seed weight.

Treatment
Intercroppinge1
Outcome
number of seeds per pod and weight of seedse0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Comparator
sole cowpea crope2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant effect in the number of seeds per pod and weight of seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–649
e1

“Intercropping reduced the number cowpea flowers per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–568
e2

“sole cowpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–228

Title

Effects of Intercropping on the Performance of Maize and Cowpeas in Botswana

Gabatshele. M. Legwaila; Teko. K. Marokane; Witness Mojeremane International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2012. doi:10.5923/j.ijaf.20120206.07

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-eef2cbd3737215b19a6b4bf57dfdc0b933eb3550205946a54481970ef1cb7b35 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 63 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.