Intervention effectmodel-written summary

75% RDNP with Azospirillum (HAU), PSB and PPFM yielded 2.91 tonne/ha seed cotton versus 2.54 tonne/ha with 100% RDNP without bio-inoculants.

A claim from Bio inoculants for enhancing the productivity and nutrient uptake of winter irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) under graded levels of nitrogen and phosphatic fertilizers. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDNP with Azospirillum (HAU), PSB and PPFM yielded 2.91 tonne/ha seed cotton versus 2.54 tonne/ha with 100% RDNP without bio-inoculants.

Treatment
75% RDNP along with Azospirillum (HAU) + PSB + PPFMe0
Interactor
Azospirillum (HAU)Azospirillume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
seed cottone0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
2.91 tonne/hae0
Qualifier
2.54 tonne/hae0
Comparator
100% RDNP without bio-inoculantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 75% RDNP along with Azospirillum (HAU) + PSB + PPFM yielded 2.91 tonne/ha seed cotton with higher net return (Rs 40,553) and net B:C ratio value of 1.94 while, application of 100% RDNP without bio-inoculants yielded only 2.54 tonne/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–886

Title

Bio inoculants for enhancing the productivity and nutrient uptake of winter irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) under graded levels of nitrogen and phosphatic fertilizers.

P. Nalayini; K. Sankaranarayanan; R. Anandham Indian Journal of Agronomy 2010

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-ef8a3f074cb3478109218441235bd792c085a2b5323b7545fa2b1258ddfd72e2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

inoculation · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.