Paper · 2022 · Crop and Environment

Cotton yield response to fertilizer phosphorus under a range of nitrogen management tactics

Gunasekhar Nachimuthu; Graeme Schwenke; Jon Baird; et al.

11
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Long term crop nutrient removal is leading to decline in available phosphorus (P) in Vertisols. To improve the efficiency of P fertilizer applied for cotton production it is important to understand its interaction with other applied nutrients, particularly nitrogen (N). Four experiments were conducted to investigate the cotton lint yield response to applied P fertilizer (dispersed throughout the beds) under (i) three different N rates, (ii) various split-N application timing treatments, (iii) additional late N application and (iv) two water-run urea application strategies. Cotton lint yield response to applied P fertilizer was influenced by split-N application ratio and timing, but not N rates or water run N strategies. Additional late N application reduced lint yield and P response. Applying all the N fertilizer pre-plant along with P increased cotton lint yield by 37.2% (with 32.5% greater seed yield), compared with applying P before planting and all N fertilizer in-crop. Phosphorus application improved lint turnout by increasing cotton lint and reducing trash. These results indicate improved agronomic efficiency of applied P fertilizer dispersed throughout the beds can be possible by supplying crops with optimum N earlier in the season. The P dispersion throughout the plant beds potentially improved the P acquisition by cotton roots—where more N was applied pre-plant than in-crop. Future research needs to focus on greater understanding of the N-priming effect on cotton root growth and its impact on response to applied P.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton lint yield response to applied P fertilizer was influenced by split-N application ratio and timing.

Treatment
split-N application ratio and timinge1
Outcome
lint yield response to applied P fertilizere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cotton lint yield response to applied P fertilizer was influenced by split-N application ratio and timing, but not N rates or water run N strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–728 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton lint yield response to applied P fertilizer was not influenced by N rates.

Treatment
N ratese1
Outcome
lint yield response to applied P fertilizere1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cotton lint yield response to applied P fertilizer was influenced by split-N application ratio and timing, but not N rates or water run N strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–728 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton lint yield response to applied P fertilizer was not influenced by water-run N strategies.

Treatment
water run N strategiese1
Outcome
lint yield response to applied P fertilizere1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cotton lint yield response to applied P fertilizer was influenced by split-N application ratio and timing, but not N rates or water run N strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying all N fertilizer pre-plant along with P increased cotton lint yield by 37.2% compared with applying P before planting and all N fertilizer in-crop.

Treatment
Applying all the N fertilizer pre-plant along with Pe1
Outcome
cotton lint yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
37.2%e1
Comparator
applying P before planting and all N fertilizer in-crope1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Applying all the N fertilizer pre-plant along with P increased cotton lint yield by 37.2% (with 32.5% greater seed yield), compared with applying P before planting and all N fertilizer in-crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying all N fertilizer pre-plant along with P gave 32.5% greater seed yield than applying P before planting and all N fertilizer in-crop.

Treatment
Applying all the N fertilizer pre-plant along with Pe1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
greatere1
Value
32.5%e1
Comparator
applying P before planting and all N fertilizer in-crope1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Applying all the N fertilizer pre-plant along with P increased cotton lint yield by 37.2% (with 32.5% greater seed yield), compared with applying P before planting and all N fertilizer in-crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional late N application reduced lint yield and P response.

Treatment
Additional late N applicatione1
Outcome
lint yield and P responsee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Additional late N application reduced lint yield and P response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–793 · show in text ↑
e2

“To improve the efficiency of P fertilizer applied for cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–167 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude that agronomic efficiency of applied P fertilizer dispersed throughout the beds can be improved by supplying crops with optimum N earlier in the season.

Treatment
supplying crops with optimum N earlier in the seasone1
Outcome
agronomic efficiency of applied P fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These results indicate improved agronomic efficiency of applied P fertilizer dispersed throughout the beds can be possible by supplying crops with optimum N earlier in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1258 · show in text ↑
e2

“To improve the efficiency of P fertilizer applied for cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application improved cotton lint turnout.

Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione1
Outcome
lint turnoute1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Phosphorus application improved lint turnout by increasing cotton lint and reducing trash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application reduced cotton trash.

Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione1
Outcome
trashe1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Phosphorus application improved lint turnout by increasing cotton lint and reducing trash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased cotton lint.

Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione1
Outcome
cotton linte1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Phosphorus application improved lint turnout by increasing cotton lint and reducing trash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1078 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Dispersing P throughout the plant beds potentially improved P acquisition by cotton roots.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
P dispersion throughout the plant bedse1
Outcome
P acquisitione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The P dispersion throughout the plant beds potentially improved the P acquisition by cotton roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1357 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

103 papers: 65 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

phosphorus · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.