Abstract
Abstract Field studies compared yields between plow‐down and sidedress N and fall, winter, and spring applied P‐K for corn ( Zea mays L.) on Piedmont soil and corn and cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) on Coastal Plains acid soils. There were no significant yield differences for the Piedmont soil. For the Coastal Plain soil over a 3‐year period, winter‐ and spring‐applied P and K were superior to fall applications and sidedress N was better than plow‐down N for corn production. Similar N responses were obtained for cotton. However, there was no difference between the fall‐ and winter‐applied P and K, but the spring application yielded significantly (P—.01) more lint cotton than the fall or winter treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
No significant corn yield differences were found for the Piedmont soil.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0 - Outcome
- yielde1
- Setting
- Piedmont soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corn ( Zea mays L.) on Piedmont soil”
e1“There were no significant yield differences for the Piedmont soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Over three years on the Coastal Plain soil, winter- and spring-applied P and K were superior to fall applications for corn.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- winter‐ and spring‐applied P and Ke2
- Outcome
- yieldse3
- Direction
- superiore2
- Comparator
- fall applicationse2
- Setting
- Coastal Plain soile4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corn ( Zea mays L.) on Piedmont soil”
e2“winter‐ and spring‐applied P and K were superior to fall applications”
e3“Field studies compared yields between plow‐down and sidedress N”
e4“For the Coastal Plain soil over a 3‐year period”
Claim · model-written summary
Sidedress N was better than plow-down N for corn production.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- sidedress Ne5
- Outcome
- corn productione5
- Direction
- bettere5
- Comparator
- plow‐down Ne5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corn ( Zea mays L.) on Piedmont soil”
e5“sidedress N was better than plow‐down N for corn production”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton showed similar N responses to sidedress N and plow-down N.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume6 - Treatment
- sidedress Ne5
- Outcome
- N responsese6
- Direction
- Similare6
- Comparator
- plow‐down Ne5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“sidedress N was better than plow‐down N for corn production”
e6“Similar N responses were obtained for cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
There was no difference in cotton lint yield between fall- and winter-applied P and K.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume2
- Treatment
- winter‐applied P and Ke1
- Outcome
- lint cottone2
- Direction
- no differencee1
- Comparator
- falle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“there was no difference between the fall‐ and winter‐applied P and K”
e2“the spring application yielded significantly (P—.01) more lint cotton than the fall or winter treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring-applied P and K gave significantly more cotton lint than fall or winter applications.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- spring applicatione1
- Outcome
- lint cottone1
- Direction
- moree1
- Qualifier
- P—.01e1
- Comparator
- fall or winter treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the spring application yielded significantly (P—.01) more lint cotton than the fall or winter treatments”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →phosphorus · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
290 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
316 papers more in this group
See all 320 papers →phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
623 papers more in this group
See all 627 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.