Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation produced maximum soil available N.
- Taxon
- forage sorghume0
- Treatment
- Azotobacter + Azospirillum inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- Azospirillum
Azospirillume0symbiont - Outcome
- available N content in the soile0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum green forage and crude protein content of forage sorghum as well as available N content in the soil were recorded under Azotobacter + Azospirillum inoculation, although the effect on green forage yield was non-significant.”
Title
PK Yadav; Ayan Sadhu; P.K. Swarnkar; et al. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2010
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Chemical fertilizer plus FYM gave significantly higher green forage yield than other treatments.
- Intervention effect Chemical fertilizer plus castor cake gave significantly higher green forage yield than other treatments.
- Intervention effect The mixed chemical and organic N applications significantly increased crude protein content against other treatments.
- Intervention effect Full organic N was significantly inferior for forage production.
- Intervention effect Full organic N increased soil available N relative to full chemical N.
- Intervention effect Full organic N increased soil microbial count relative to full chemical N.
- Intervention effect Azotobacter plus Azospirillum inoculation gave maximum green forage yield, without a significant effect.
- Intervention effect Dual inoculation produced maximum forage crude protein content.
- Intervention effect Azotobacter inoculation significantly raised Azotobacter counts.
- Intervention effect Azospirillum inoculation significantly raised Azospirillum counts.
- Intervention effect No biofertilizer inoculation gave significantly lower soil available N.
- Intervention effect No biofertilizer inoculation gave significantly lower Azotobacter and Azospirillum populations.
- Intervention effect Integrated organic and inorganic fertilizers with inoculation raised rhizosphere Azotobacter and Azospirillum populations in both years.
- Intervention effect Integrated fertilizers and inoculation enhanced soil available N in 2004.
- Intervention effect Full organic N with dual inoculation yielded the highest Azotobacter and Azospirillum populations.