Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero tillage yielded system productivity of 9.08 and 9.04 t/ ha in the two years.

A claim from Effect of conservation agriculture practices and irrigation scheduling on productivity and water-use efficiency of maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage yielded system productivity of 9.08 and 9.04 t/ ha in the two years.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZTe0
Outcome
system productivitye0
Value
9.08 and 9.04 t/ hae0
Comparator
GTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest system productivity was recorded under RB (9.92 and 9.80 t/ha) followed by ZT (9.08 and 9.04 t/ ha) and the minimum under GT (8.63 and 8.84 t/ha during 201112 and 201213 respectively) during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1211
t0

“maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–156

Title

Effect of conservation agriculture practices and irrigation scheduling on productivity and water-use efficiency of maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system

SUNIL KUMAR; S.S. PARIHAR; MAN SINGH; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v61i4.4410

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-f0513415cfe6ec007f82622ea059a0a2d67458132d144db46a32c590daef2ac2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Raised bed with 125% N was superior for green fodder and dry matter yields.

    Nutritional quality of baby corn fodder as influenced by tillage practices and nitrogen management · 2019 · compared with rest of the treatments

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Cover-crop no-tillage and standard no-tillage gave similar corn yields.

    Potential Long‐Term Benefits of No‐Tillage and Organic Cropping Systems for Grain Production and Soil Improvement · 2007 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    No-till produced less corn grain than plow tillage.

    Tillage and Rotation Interactions for Corn and Soybean Grain Yield as Affected by Precipitation and Air Temperature · 2004 · compared with plow

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Tillage had no grain-yield effect in manure or compost plots in three of four years.

    Composted and Noncomposted Manure Application to Conventional and No‐Tillage Systems: Corn Yield and Nitrogen Uptake · 1999

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    No-tillage corn grain yield was 5% lower than under conventional tillage.

    Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System · 2003 · compared with conventional tillage system

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Continuous no-till corn on Chalmers soil was 2% wetter at harvest than plowed corn.

    Long‐Term Tillage and Rotation Effects on Corn Growth and Yield on High and Low Organic Matter, Poorly Drained Soils · 1988 · compared with plowing

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    No-tillage without red clover reduced corn grain yield by 13% versus conventional tillage over three years.

    Red Clover and Tillage Influence on Soil Temperature, Water Content, and Corn Emergence · 1999 · compared with conventional tillage treatment

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    A significant tillage x year interaction indicated equal continuous corn yields for CT and NT in the first 2 years.

    Corn Production as Affected by Tillage System and Starter Fertilizer · 2002 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.