Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Temporary immersion did not significantly enhance callus fresh mass compared with solidified medium.

A claim from A comparative study between solid and liquid cultures relative to callus growth and somatic embryo formation in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Zaghlool · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Temporary immersion did not significantly enhance callus fresh mass compared with solidified medium.

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
temporary immersion systeme0
Outcome
fresh mass of calluse0
Direction
did not significantly enhancee0
Comparator
solidified mediume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The temporary immersion system did not significantly enhance the fresh mass of callus compared to the solidified medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1386
t0

“date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Zaghlool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–159

Title

A comparative study between solid and liquid cultures relative to callus growth and somatic embryo formation in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Zaghlool

Y Ibraheembr; I Böhme Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 2013. doi:10.9755/ejfa.v25i11.16661

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-f2485b5a87c7087d06650a2da7b6026d1897f68a3bc5b4b288a03d4c0b3014f4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

application · growth · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.