Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pruning in this late-July timing results in fewer renewal shoots from the pruning stubs.

A claim from Evaluation of Pruning Techniques and Bactericides to Manage Bacterial Canker of Sweet Cherry · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning in this late-July timing results in fewer renewal shoots from the pruning stubs.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume2
Treatment
this timinge3
Outcome
renewal shootse3
Direction
fewere3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Field experiments on pruning date have provided evidence that the best time to prune sweet cherry in terms of limiting bacterial canker infection may be shortly after harvest in late July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2163
e3

“However, this timing results in fewer renewal shoots from the pruning stubs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2165–2240

Title

Evaluation of Pruning Techniques and Bactericides to Manage Bacterial Canker of Sweet Cherry

Juliet Carroll; Terence L. Robinson; Thomas J. Bürr; et al. 2010

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-f4cbfd3bd8313c89d29d8b22cf8ac0901b5026c4253bfd6fbe1f3b8ec6f1c137 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer