Paper · 2010

Evaluation of Pruning Techniques and Bactericides to Manage Bacterial Canker of Sweet Cherry

Juliet Carroll; Terence L. Robinson; Thomas J. Bürr; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bacterial canker of stone fruit occurs worldwide and is caused by Pseudomonas syringae for which three distinct pathovars are known that are associated with host range (Kennel ly et a l 2007, Hattingh and Roos 1995). We have focused on pathovar Syringae, which has been the most commonly isolated P. syringae pathovar from sweet cherry orchards (Renick et al. 2008, Foulkes and Lloyd 1980). The bac ter ium colonizes leaf surfaces of many plant species , including weeds. They can invade cherry buds, twigs, and branches systemically without causing symptoms, can incite mild symptoms including dead buds, twig cankers, leaf spots, flower and fruit lesions, or can cause severe symptoms of collapse and death of the above-ground parts of the tree, including the suckers (Figure 1). Disease severity and symptom expression is favored by factors including poor nutrition, plant parasitic nematodes, sandy soils, and by climatic factors such as late spring frosts and cool, wet growing conditions. The pathogen invades the tree through leaf stomates from which it moves into buds and twigs. It may also enter through pruning wounds and through frost-damaged tissues (Renick et al. 2008, Sule and Seemuller 1987). Leaf surface populations increase during cool, wet weather and are highest during fall, late winter and early spring (Latorre et al 1985). Copper sprays are aimed at reducing these epiphytic populations and are timed to correspond with 20% (Figure 2) and 80% leaf drop and up to three late dormant applications (Wimalajeewa et al 1991, Olson and Jones 1983). Best management relies on maintaining optimal growing conditions for the trees. “our studies have shown that copper or phosphite sprays applied on pruning wounds of sweet cherry provide minimal to no protection against bacterial canker infection. we have found that leaving an 8” pruning stub when removing a limb may protect against pseudomonasincited cankers by ‘distancing’ the main trunk from invasion. Field experiments on pruning date have provided evidence that the best time to prune sweet cherry in terms of limiting bacterial canker infection may be shortly after harvest in late July. However, this timing results in fewer renewal shoots from the pruning stubs.” Figure 1. Bacterial canker of sweet cherry below a pruning cut and progression down the branch (Sunken area on branch). Replacement side shoot has also developed bacterial canker.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper or phosphite sprays applied on pruning wounds of sweet cherry provided minimal to no protection against bacterial canker infection.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume1
Treatment
copper or phosphite sprays applied on pruning woundse1
Outcome
protection against bacterial canker infectione1
Direction
minimale1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“our studies have shown that copper or phosphite sprays applied on pruning wounds of sweet cherry provide minimal to no protection against bacterial canker infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaving a pruning stub when removing a limb may protect sweet cherry against pseudomonas-incited cankers.

Taxon
Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
pruning stube1
Outcome
pseudomonasincited cankerse1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacterial Canker of Sweet Cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“we have found that leaving an 8” pruning stub when removing a limb may protect against pseudomonasincited cankers by ‘distancing’ the main trunk from invasion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning sweet cherry shortly after harvest in late July may best limit bacterial canker infection, according to field pruning-date experiments.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume2
Treatment
shortly after harvest in late Julye2
Outcome
limiting bacterial canker infectione2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Field experiments on pruning date have provided evidence that the best time to prune sweet cherry in terms of limiting bacterial canker infection may be shortly after harvest in late July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning in this late-July timing results in fewer renewal shoots from the pruning stubs.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume2
Treatment
this timinge3
Outcome
renewal shootse3
Direction
fewere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Field experiments on pruning date have provided evidence that the best time to prune sweet cherry in terms of limiting bacterial canker infection may be shortly after harvest in late July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2163 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, this timing results in fewer renewal shoots from the pruning stubs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2165–2240 · show in text ↑

pruning · disease · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · disease · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.