Claim · model-written summary
Copper or phosphite sprays applied on pruning wounds of sweet cherry provided minimal to no protection against bacterial canker infection.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry
Prunus aviume1 - Treatment
- copper or phosphite sprays applied on pruning woundse1
- Outcome
- protection against bacterial canker infectione1
- Direction
- minimale1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“our studies have shown that copper or phosphite sprays applied on pruning wounds of sweet cherry provide minimal to no protection against bacterial canker infection”
Title
Evaluation of Pruning Techniques and Bactericides to Manage Bacterial Canker of Sweet Cherry
Juliet Carroll; Terence L. Robinson; Thomas J. Bürr; et al. 2010
Other claims from this paper (3)
- Intervention effect Leaving a pruning stub when removing a limb may protect sweet cherry against pseudomonas-incited cankers.
- Intervention effect Pruning sweet cherry shortly after harvest in late July may best limit bacterial canker infection, according to field pruning-date experiments.
- Intervention effect Pruning in this late-July timing results in fewer renewal shoots from the pruning stubs.