Paper · 2024 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Responses of ‘Burlat’ Sweet Cherry Trees to Selenium Fertilisation under Low Soil Selenium Conditions

Paweł Wójcik

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Selenium (Se) malnutrition in humans primarily results from low soil Se availability. In this study, we examined the effects of soil application and preharvest Se sprays on the vegetative growth, yield response, Se nutrition, and fruit quality of ‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees. Selenium was applied through (i) soil application at a rate of 250 g ha − 1 or 500 g ha − 1 in each season and in the first year of the study, respectively, and (ii) four preharvest sprays per season at a rate of 15 g ha − 1 spray − 1 . Se sprays were applied with or without calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ). Leaves from Se-fertilised trees contained more Se and had enhanced SPAD readings. However, the Se treatments did not affect tree growth and fruit yield. Compared to the control fruit, Se concentrations in fruit from trees sprayed with Se and CaCl 2 , trees sprayed with Se alone, and trees supplied with Se to the soil were increased 15-, 12-, and 8-fold, respectively. None of the Se treatments affected fruit size, and acidity and the soluble solids concentration (SSC) of the fruit. Only the combined sprays of Se and CaCl 2 decreased the incidence of rain-induced fruit cracking. None of the tested Se treatments resulted in leaf injuries. In sweet cherry orchards, at least for the ‘Burlat’ variety, grown in low Se soils, preharvest Se sprays with or without CaCl 2 can be recommended to biofortify the fruit with Se and increase SSC in the fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves of Se-fertilised sweet cherry trees contained more Se.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Organ / stage
Leavese1
Treatment
Se-fertilisede1
Outcome
See1
Direction
contained moree1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaves from Se-fertilised trees contained more Se and had enhanced SPAD readings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves of Se-fertilised sweet cherry trees had enhanced SPAD readings.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Organ / stage
Leavese1
Treatment
Se-fertilisede1
Outcome
SPAD readingse1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaves from Se-fertilised trees contained more Se and had enhanced SPAD readings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Se treatments did not affect tree growth and fruit yield of sweet cherry.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
Se treatmentse2
Outcome
tree growth and fruit yielde2
Direction
did not affecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“the Se treatments did not affect tree growth and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from sweet cherry trees sprayed with Se and CaCl 2 had 15-fold higher Se concentration than control fruit.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
sprayed with Se and CaCl 2e3
Outcome
Se concentrations in fruite3
Direction
were increasede3
Value
15e3
Qualifier
15-, 12-, and 8-folde3
Comparator
control fruite3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to the control fruit, Se concentrations in fruit from trees sprayed with Se and CaCl 2 , trees sprayed with Se alone, and trees supplied with Se to the soil were increased 15-, 12-, and 8-fold, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from sweet cherry trees sprayed with Se alone had 12-fold higher Se concentration than control fruit.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
trees sprayed with Se alonee3
Outcome
Se concentrations in fruite3
Direction
were increasede3
Value
12e3
Qualifier
15-, 12-, and 8-folde3
Comparator
control fruite3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to the control fruit, Se concentrations in fruit from trees sprayed with Se and CaCl 2 , trees sprayed with Se alone, and trees supplied with Se to the soil were increased 15-, 12-, and 8-fold, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from sweet cherry trees supplied with Se to the soil had 8-fold higher Se concentration than control fruit.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
trees supplied with Se to the soile3
Outcome
Se concentrations in fruite3
Direction
were increasede3
Value
8e3
Qualifier
15-, 12-, and 8-folde3
Comparator
control fruite3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to the control fruit, Se concentrations in fruit from trees sprayed with Se and CaCl 2 , trees sprayed with Se alone, and trees supplied with Se to the soil were increased 15-, 12-, and 8-fold, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Se treatments did not affect fruit size of sweet cherry.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
Se treatmentse4
Outcome
fruit sizee4
Direction
affectede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e4

“None of the Se treatments affected fruit size, and acidity and the soluble solids concentration (SSC) of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Se treatments did not affect fruit acidity or soluble solids concentration of sweet cherry.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
Se treatmentse4
Outcome
acidity and the soluble solids concentration (SSC) of the fruite4
Direction
affectede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e4

“None of the Se treatments affected fruit size, and acidity and the soluble solids concentration (SSC) of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined sprays of Se and CaCl 2 decreased the incidence of rain-induced fruit cracking in sweet cherry.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
combined sprays of Se and CaCl 2e5
Outcome
incidence of rain-induced fruit crackinge5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e5

“Only the combined sprays of Se and CaCl 2 decreased the incidence of rain-induced fruit cracking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the tested Se treatments caused leaf injuries in sweet cherry.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
tested Se treatmentse6
Outcome
leaf injuriese6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Burlat’ sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e6

“None of the tested Se treatments resulted in leaf injuries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1250 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest Se sprays with or without CaCl 2 can be recommended to biofortify sweet cherry fruit with Se and increase fruit SSC in low-Se soils.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume6
Outcome
preharvest Se sprayse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“preharvest Se sprays with or without CaCl 2 can be recommended to biofortify the fruit with Se and increase SSC in the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1460 · show in text ↑
e6

“In sweet cherry orchards, at least for the ‘Burlat’ variety, grown in low Se soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1334 · show in text ↑

calcium dichloride · nutrient: content · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium dichloride · disease · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · disease · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.