Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Medics at 260 seeds m− 2 reduced weed dry weight by 69% at Becker relative to corn monoculture.

A claim from Effect of Annual Medic Smother Plants on Weed Control and Yield in Corn · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medics at 260 seeds m− 2 reduced weed dry weight by 69% at Becker relative to corn monoculture.

Treatment
Medics seeded with corne0
Interactor
weede0weed
Second interactor
MedicsMedicagoe0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
69%e0
Comparator
monoculture corne0
Setting
Beckere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago
Medicago · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ivar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Medics seeded with corn at a rate high enough to consistently suppress weeds (260 seeds m− 2 ) reduced weed dry weight 14 wk after corn emergence by 69% at Becker and by 41% at Rosemount compared with monoculture corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1028

Title

Effect of Annual Medic Smother Plants on Weed Control and Yield in Corn

Robert L. De Haan; Craig C. Sheaffer; Donald K. Barnes Agronomy Journal 1997. doi:10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900050016x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-f7c7ce55940064519381ce12c05be8d73da70adb8773ab35ee0e078c6885e20e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.