Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Straw yield of wheat was significantly higher with PGPR consortia plus recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers (13.27 g/pot).

A claim from Effect of Inoculation of PGPR Consortia on N Supply, Growth and Grain Yield of Wheat Crop · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield of wheat was significantly higher with PGPR consortia plus recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers (13.27 g/pot).

Treatment
PGPR consortia was applied along with recommended dose of inorganic fertilizerse3
Interactor
PGPR consortiae3symbiont
Outcome
straw yielde3
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
13.27g/pote3
Comparator
recommended dose of chemical fertilizerse3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The aim of present investigation was to study the inoculation effect of PGPR consortia on N supply, growth and grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131
e3

“The straw yield of wheat was found significantly higher when PGPR consortia was applied along with recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers (p<0.05; 13.27g/pot) which was equal to recommended dose of chemical fertilizers (p<0.05; 13.27g/pot) and at par with T5 (p<0.05; 12.22g/pot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–865

Title

Effect of Inoculation of PGPR Consortia on N Supply, Growth and Grain Yield of Wheat Crop

Diksha Vishwakarma; J.K. Thakur; S.C. Gupta International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.306

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-f964674c9c73d05b03e3932d4107e591fc83378e7c45d7a562ddb1e11aaa7d61 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this claim · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Fusarium inoculation significantly lowered winter wheat yield by 24.2-45.0% relative to uninoculated check plots.

    Effects of Field Application of Tebuconazole on Yield, Yield Components and the Mycotoxin Content of Fusarium-infected Wheat Grain · 2000 · compared with Check plots

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Inoculation with F. culmorum significantly reduced wheat yield.

    Fusarium ear blight of wheat: the use of quantitative PCR and visual disease assessment in studies of disease control · 1999

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Biofertilizer as a soil mix reduced wheat growth and yield versus conventional N.

    Chemical and Biological Enhancement Effects of Biochar on Wheat Growth and Yield under Arid Field Conditions · 2021 · compared with control (conventional N fertilization)

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Inoculation had negligible effect on grain yield and nitrogen uptake.

    Effects of Field Inoculation with VAM and Bacteria Consortia on Root Growth and Nutrients Uptake in Common Wheat · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    In field plots, WSMV reduced forage yield in susceptible wheat.

    Effects of Wheat streak mosaic virus on Root Development and Water-Use Efficiency of Hard Red Winter Wheat · 2010 · compared with noninoculated plots

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Locally adapted and Australian standards showed comparable yield reduction after inoculation.

    Variability of Fusarium Crown Rot Tolerances Among Cultivars of Spring and Winter Wheat · 2009 · compared with Australian standards

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Inoculated and control wheat plants did not differ in dry matter production or total N content.

    Alteration of size of wheat root systems and nitrogen fixation by associative nitrogen-fixing bacteria measured under field conditions · 1988 · compared with control plants

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Pathogen inoculations reduced wheat 1000-kernel weight, weight and number of kernels per head.

    Fusarium Head Blight of Common Polish Winter Wheat Cultivars – Comparison of Effects of Fusarium avenaceum and Fusarium culmorum on Yield Components · 2002

    Opposite direction

605 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Current high nitrogen practices do not significantly raise crop yields relative to optimum fertilization.

    Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems · 2009 · compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Wheat yield declined by 0.04 Mg ha −1 yr −1 with 75 and 100% N-P-K fertilizer.

    Yield and Soil Nutrient Changes in a Long‐Term Rice‐Wheat Rotation in India · 2002

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    The authors concluded that N fertiliser could not compensate for the yield reduction in canola and wheat due to late sowing.

    Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components · 2001

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Genetic gain in winter wheat yield without fertiliser N was 0.021 t ha −1 y −1, smaller than at 215–250 kg/ha N.

    Responses of grain yield, biomass and harvest index and their rates of genetic progress to nitrogen availability in ten winter wheat varieties · 2006 · compared with 215–250 kg/ha N

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    The fertilizing substances did not significantly change plant yields.

    The influence of chlorothalonil on the activity of soil microorganisms and enzymes · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Compost did not significantly affect wheat grain yield, biomass or harvest index.

    Responses of Wheat Yield, Macro- and Micro-Nutrients, and Heavy Metals in Soil and Wheat following the Application of Manure Compost on the North China Plain · 2016

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Wheat yields were similar in fertilized fallow and unfertilized green-manure plots.

    Wheat Yields, Nitrogen Uptake, and Soil Moisture Following Winter Legume Cover Crop vs. Fallow · 1998 · compared with unfertilized plots following a green manure crop

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Incorporation timing of feedlot cattle manure had no impact on soil or crop performance.

    Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan · 2004

    Opposite direction

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.