Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Inoculation of PGPR Consortia on N Supply, Growth and Grain Yield of Wheat Crop

Diksha Vishwakarma; J.K. Thakur; S.C. Gupta

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The aim of present investigation was to study the inoculation effect of PGPR consortia on N supply, growth and grain yield of wheat. Results revealed the highest nitrate reductase activity with inoculation of PGPR at recommended dose of N fertilizer compared to all other treatments, indicating bioinoculant on availability of nitrogen. The highest root length was recorded in T4 (50%N+ Consortium of PGPR) which was statistically at par with T6 and T5. The root length measured for T2 (Consortium of PGPR only) (p<0.05; 14.4cm) was at par with T3 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizers). The straw yield of wheat was found significantly higher when PGPR consortia was applied along with recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers (p<0.05; 13.27g/pot) which was equal to recommended dose of chemical fertilizers (p<0.05; 13.27g/pot) and at par with T5 (p<0.05; 12.22g/pot). The grain yield of wheat was found numerically higher in T6 (p<0.05; 11.68g/pot) but was statistically at par with T3 i.e. RDF treatment (p<0.05; 10.28g/pot). Study suggested that after confirmation these isolates can be utilized as potential bioinoculants for enhancing wheat productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation at the recommended N dose gave the highest nitrate reductase activity in wheat compared with all other treatments.

Treatment
inoculation of PGPR at recommended dose of N fertilizere0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The aim of present investigation was to study the inoculation effect of PGPR consortia on N supply, growth and grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results revealed the highest nitrate reductase activity with inoculation of PGPR at recommended dose of N fertilizer compared to all other treatments, indicating bioinoculant on availability of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest root length in wheat was recorded in T4 (50%N plus PGPR consortium), at par with T6 and T5.

Treatment
T4 (50%N+ Consortium of PGPR)e1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
T6 and T5e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The aim of present investigation was to study the inoculation effect of PGPR consortia on N supply, growth and grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest root length was recorded in T4 (50%N+ Consortium of PGPR) which was statistically at par with T6 and T5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length of wheat under the PGPR consortium alone (14.4cm) was at par with the recommended dose of fertilizers.

Treatment
Consortium of PGPR onlye2
Interactor
PGPRe2symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe2
Direction
at pare2
Value
14.4cme2
Comparator
Recommended Dose of Fertilizerse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The aim of present investigation was to study the inoculation effect of PGPR consortia on N supply, growth and grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“The root length measured for T2 (Consortium of PGPR only) (p<0.05; 14.4cm) was at par with T3 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield of wheat was significantly higher with PGPR consortia plus recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers (13.27 g/pot).

Treatment
PGPR consortia was applied along with recommended dose of inorganic fertilizerse3
Interactor
PGPR consortiae3symbiont
Outcome
straw yielde3
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
13.27g/pote3
Comparator
recommended dose of chemical fertilizerse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The aim of present investigation was to study the inoculation effect of PGPR consortia on N supply, growth and grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“The straw yield of wheat was found significantly higher when PGPR consortia was applied along with recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers (p<0.05; 13.27g/pot) which was equal to recommended dose of chemical fertilizers (p<0.05; 13.27g/pot) and at par with T5 (p<0.05; 12.22g/pot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield of wheat with PGPR consortia plus recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers was equal to the recommended dose of chemical fertilizers alone (13.27 g/pot).

Treatment
PGPR consortia was applied along with recommended dose of inorganic fertilizerse3
Interactor
PGPR consortiae3symbiont
Outcome
straw yielde3
Direction
equal toe3
Value
13.27g/pote3
Comparator
recommended dose of chemical fertilizerse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The aim of present investigation was to study the inoculation effect of PGPR consortia on N supply, growth and grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“The straw yield of wheat was found significantly higher when PGPR consortia was applied along with recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers (p<0.05; 13.27g/pot) which was equal to recommended dose of chemical fertilizers (p<0.05; 13.27g/pot) and at par with T5 (p<0.05; 12.22g/pot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–865 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield of wheat under PGPR plus recommended fertilizer was at par with T5 (12.22 g/pot).

Outcome
straw yielde3
Direction
at par withe3
Value
12.22g/pote3
Comparator
T5e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The aim of present investigation was to study the inoculation effect of PGPR consortia on N supply, growth and grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“The straw yield of wheat was found significantly higher when PGPR consortia was applied along with recommended dose of inorganic fertilizers (p<0.05; 13.27g/pot) which was equal to recommended dose of chemical fertilizers (p<0.05; 13.27g/pot) and at par with T5 (p<0.05; 12.22g/pot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixednot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of wheat was numerically higher in T6 (11.68 g/pot) but statistically at par with the RDF treatment (10.28 g/pot).

Treatment
T6e4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
numerically highere4
Value
11.68g/pote4
Comparator
T3 i.e. RDF treatmente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The aim of present investigation was to study the inoculation effect of PGPR consortia on N supply, growth and grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grain yield of wheat was found numerically higher in T6 (p<0.05; 11.68g/pot) but was statistically at par with T3 i.e. RDF treatment (p<0.05; 10.28g/pot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1024 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The PGPR isolates can potentially be used as bioinoculants to enhance wheat productivity, after confirmation.

Outcome
potential bioinoculantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Study suggested that after confirmation these isolates can be utilized as potential bioinoculants for enhancing wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1156 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.