Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Potassium content of mulberry leaves was 2.85% under 100% nitrogen through vermicompost.

A claim from Quality of mulberry (Morus indica L.) leaves as influenced by integrated nitrogen management practices · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium content of mulberry leaves was 2.85% under 100% nitrogen through vermicompost.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Organ / stage
leavese3
Treatment
100% nitrogen through vermicomposte3
Outcome
potassiume3
Direction
highere3
Value
2.85%e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“mulberry (Morus indica L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–142
e3

“The phosphorus (0.29%) and potassium (2.85%) contents of leaves were higher in 100% nitrogen through vermicompost,whereas magnesium content of leaves (0.72%) was higher in 50% nitrogen each through poultry manure and urea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 758–980

Title

Quality of mulberry (Morus indica L.) leaves as influenced by integrated nitrogen management practices

G. Janardhan; C. Ramachandra; M. B. Shivanna; et al. Crop Research 2011

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-fa815da90bf0bcde6abc53b01a5dfb7588bbf837502fe21bcc643fcae6d7e985 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.