Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Maize yield attributes were significantly superior in intercropping.

A claim from Evolution A Alternate Pathway of Maize+Mashbean Intercropping System to Planting Geometry and Nutrient Management in Alluvial Plain Zone of India · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield attributes were significantly superior in intercropping.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize+mashbean intercropping systemse0
Interactor
mashbeane0other
Outcome
cob length, number of cobs per plant, number of grains/cobe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes (such as, cob length, number of cobs per plant, number of grains/cob and grain yield/plant,), yields Viz., grain, stover and biological per hectare and uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in maize were significantly superior in maize+mashbean intercropping systems than their sole cropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1146

Title

Evolution A Alternate Pathway of Maize+Mashbean Intercropping System to Planting Geometry and Nutrient Management in Alluvial Plain Zone of India

Ashish Dwivedi; Adesh Singh; Raj Vir Singh; et al. Progressive Agriculture 2015. doi:10.5958/0976-4615.2015.00010.1

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-fac104d15586a5bc0cd3c72f362cebcda6222290c0c0147c7100031f831b4133 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this claim · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    When intercropped with beans, the yields of organic and conventional systems were similar.

    Productivity, profitability and partial nutrient balance in maize-based conventional and organic farming systems in Kenya · 2016

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Seeding intercrops when corn was 0.15 to 0.30 m high did not change first-year corn grain yield.

    Contributions of Ground Cover, Dry Matter, and Nitrogen from Intercrops and Cover Crops in a Corn Polyculture System1 · 1987

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    At 120 kg N ha−1, legume intercrops reduced maize yields by 18 to 31%.

    Relay‐Intercropping of Sunnhemp and Cowpea into a Smallholder Maize System in Zimbabwe · 2000

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Intercropping did not significantly affect maize grain yield in 2007.

    Effect of Intercropping and Crop Arrangement on Yield and Productivity of Late Season Maize/soybean Mixtures in the Humid Environment of South Southern Nigeria · 2012

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Intercropping reduced maize grain yield by 23–70%.

    Yield stability of cassava, maize, soya bean and cowpea intercrops · 2003 · compared with sole crop

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Intercropping maize or sorghum with legumes reduced leaf area indices, fresh weight yield at anthesis and straw yield.

    Effects of Intercropping Maize or Sorghum with Cowpeas, Pigeon Peas or Beans · 1973

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    White lupine intercropping inhibited maize growth and yield.

    Growth and phosphorus uptake of maize cultivated alone, in mixed culture with other crops or after incorporation of their residues · 2003

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    In maize/beans intercrop, maize yield was depressed by 15% compared with sole maize.

    The effect of planting combinations and weeding on the growth and yield of component crops of maize/bean and maize/pumpkin intercrops · 2002 · compared with its sole yield

    Opposite direction

825 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.