Intervention effectmodel-written summary

That intercropping and fertility combination improved soil nutrient status.

A claim from Evolution A Alternate Pathway of Maize+Mashbean Intercropping System to Planting Geometry and Nutrient Management in Alluvial Plain Zone of India · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That intercropping and fertility combination improved soil nutrient status.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Maize+mashbean intercropping with recommended NPK+Zn+PSBe1
Interactor
Mashbeant0other
Outcome
soil nutrient statuse0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides, this combination also improves the soil nutrient status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1809
e1

“Maize+mashbean intercropping with recommended NPK+Zn+PSB to maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1680
t0

“Maize+Mashbean Intercropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–68

Title

Evolution A Alternate Pathway of Maize+Mashbean Intercropping System to Planting Geometry and Nutrient Management in Alluvial Plain Zone of India

Ashish Dwivedi; Adesh Singh; Raj Vir Singh; et al. Progressive Agriculture 2015. doi:10.5958/0976-4615.2015.00010.1

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-a60fd328bb1f1ec114925ca7ab475c836063b0d6167a2a0717744da6a9123e3d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

226 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 122 positive, 19 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

132 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,155 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.