Intervention effectmodel-written summary

O-DAP plus micronutrients combined with Nano silicon plus complete spray gave the highest leaf chlorophyll content.

A claim from Effect of DAP Fertilizer Source and Nano Fertilizers (Silicon and Complete) Spray on Some Growth and Yield Indicators of Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Anber 33) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O-DAP plus micronutrients combined with Nano silicon plus complete spray gave the highest leaf chlorophyll content.

Treatment
O-DAP + micronutrients fertilizer with Nano (silicon + complete) fertilizerse0
Outcome
chlorophyll content in leavese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between O-DAP + micronutrients fertilizer with Nano (silicon + complete) fertilizers achieved the highest meanes for the most important characteristics of the crop represented by the chlorophyll content in leaves, grains yield, fertilization efficiency for production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1999
e1

“rice (cv. Anber 33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–85

Title

Effect of DAP Fertilizer Source and Nano Fertilizers (Silicon and Complete) Spray on Some Growth and Yield Indicators of Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Anber 33)

A. H. G. Al-Khuzai; H. W. A. Al-Juthery IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2020. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012008

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-fb7b1ca67ec7e4aaf430295d906dc0531ecf3ee27de293b29e6e7cbaa96eaccc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

micronutrient · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.