Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Amfisis was more resistant to drought and salinity stress than Mastoidis and Lefkolia Serron.

A claim from Hyperspectral Imagery Detects Water Deficit and Salinity Effects on Photosynthesis and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity of Three Greek Olive Varieties · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amfisis was more resistant to drought and salinity stress than Mastoidis and Lefkolia Serron.

Taxon
Olea europaeaOlea europaeae0
Material
Amfisise4
Treatment
drought and salinity stresse4
Outcome
resistant to drought and salinity stresse4
Direction
more resistante4
Comparator
‘Mastoidis’ and ‘Lefkolia Serron’e4

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The olive tree (Olea europaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33
e4

“‘Amfisis’ was more resistant to drought and salinity stress than ‘Mastoidis’ and ‘Lefkolia Serron’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–904

Title

Hyperspectral Imagery Detects Water Deficit and Salinity Effects on Photosynthesis and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity of Three Greek Olive Varieties

Boshkovski, Blagoja; Doupis, Georgios; Anhelina Zapolska; et al. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2022. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6562713

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-fde5cf685fca8d44de03ba64b4c8e2eb56062713c4eacad34b81efed9a87c9c8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

drought · disease · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.