Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing rain acidity decreased foliar concentrations of P, S and Cu in loblolly pine and white oak.

A claim from Effects of Acidic Precipitation and Ectomycorrhizal Inoculation on Growth, Mineral Nutrition, and Xylem Water Potential of Juvenile Loblolly Pine and White Oak · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing rain acidity decreased foliar concentrations of P, S and Cu in loblolly pine and white oak.

Taxon
loblolly pine and white oakPinus taedaQuercus albae4
Organ / stage
Foliare4
Treatment
increasing rain aciditye4
Outcome
concentrations of P, S, and Cue4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Quercus alba
Quercus alba · TaxonMarty Aligata · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Foliar concentrations of P, S, and Cu in loblolly pine and white oak, Ca in loblolly pine, and Fe and Zn in white oak decreased with increasing rain acidity while the Al concentration of both species increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1043

Title

Effects of Acidic Precipitation and Ectomycorrhizal Inoculation on Growth, Mineral Nutrition, and Xylem Water Potential of Juvenile Loblolly Pine and White Oak

R. F. Walker; S. B. McLaughlin Journal of Sustainable Forestry 1997. doi:10.1300/j091v05n03_03

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-fe2bc7b3d161e5c8e153aefb53375604bfc7f96e3a7e3b7e15dc2e9414d2fc57 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

rainfall · nutrient: content · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

ph · nutrient: content · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.