Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In loblolly pine, soil pH, nutrient concentrations and foliar leaching were not significantly affected by pH 3.8 or 5.2 rain.

A claim from Red spruce and loblolly pine nutritional responses to acidic precipitation and ozone · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In loblolly pine, soil pH, nutrient concentrations and foliar leaching were not significantly affected by pH 3.8 or 5.2 rain.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae4
Treatment
pH 3·8 or 5·2 rain treatmentse7
Outcome
soil pH and nutrient concentrations as well as foliar leachinge7
Direction
not significantly affectede7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–460
e7

“soil pH and nutrient concentrations as well as foliar leaching in the loblolly pine study were not significantly affected by either the pH 3·8 or 5·2 rain treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1430

Title

Red spruce and loblolly pine nutritional responses to acidic precipitation and ozone

G.S Edwards; R.E Sherman; J.M Kelly Environmental Pollution 1995. doi:10.1016/0269-7491(94)00049-j

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e5d58827c5f4c4c55be5c7fab50a3a3d3169b565a8a0430006827c76879e40ac · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

rainfall · nutrient: content · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

ph · nutrient: content · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.