By organism › Green plants › Primulaceae › Ardisia

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forty-six flavonoid glycosides were identified.

Taxon: ArdisiaArdisiat0
Outcome: flavonoid glycosidese0
Value: forty-sixe0

Verbatim

e0
“A total of forty-six flavonoid glycosides were identified”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–633

t0
“Ardisia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45

Title

Analysis of flavonoid glucosides from Ardisia and Damnacanthus spp. using UPLC-DAD-QToF/mS

Gelila Asamenew; Heon-Woong Kim; Soo Mug Cho; et al. Natural Product Research 2025. doi:10.1080/14786419.2025.2570893

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-fruit A. crenata leaves contained 503.8 ± 11.9 mg/100 g astragalin.

Taxon: ArdisiaArdisiat0
Outcome: kaempferol 3-O-glucoside (astragalin)e0
Value: 503.8 ± 11.9 mg/100 ge0

Verbatim

e0
“kaempferol 3-O-glucoside (astragalin), at 503.8 ± 11.9 mg/100 g”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–958

t0
“Ardisia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45

Title

Analysis of flavonoid glucosides from Ardisia and Damnacanthus spp. using UPLC-DAD-QToF/mS

Gelila Asamenew; Heon-Woong Kim; Soo Mug Cho; et al. Natural Product Research 2025. doi:10.1080/14786419.2025.2570893

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observation Forty-six flavonoid glycosides were identified.
Observation Red-fruit A. crenata leaves had the highest contents of 20 flavonoids.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The SCoT primer is recommended for other Ardisia species.

Taxon: ArdisiaArdisiae4
Outcome: was recommended for other species in Ardisiae4
Qualifier: the primer worked well in A. crenatae4

Verbatim

e4
“the primer worked well in A. crenata and was recommended for other species in Ardisia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1110

Title

Molecular studies of coralberry (Ardisia crenata Sims; Primulaceae) from Thailand based on SCoT markers

SUPARMAN SUPARMAN; PIMWADEE PORNPONGRUNGRUENG; PRANOM CHANTARANOTHAI Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity 2023. doi:10.13057/biodiv/d240611

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ardisia, Euphorbia and Glochidion each had nine species.

Taxon: ArdisiaArdisiae0
Outcome: 9 speciese0
Value: 9 speciese0

Verbatim

e0
“Ardisia (9 species), Euphorbia (9 species), Glochidion (9 species)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717

Title

Uses Of Medicinal Flowering Plant Species In Lang Son Province, Vietnam

Thu Bui; Ha; Tran The Bach; et al. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology 2023. doi:10.47750/jptcp.2023.1083

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The inventory listed 1074 medicinal flowering plant species in 623 genera and 155 families in Lang Son province.
Observation Fabaceae had 103 species, the largest family count listed.
Observation Euphorbiaceae had 91 species.
Observation Asteraceae had 75 species.
Observation Rubiaceae and Lamiaceae each had 36 species.
Observation Poaceae had 33 species.
Observation Caesalpiniaceae had 27 species.
Observation Rosaceae and Urticaceae each had 22 species.
Observation Moraceae had 21 species.
Observation Desmodium and Ficus each had 14 species.
Observation Solanum had 12 species.
Observation Crotalaria had 11 species.
Observation Bauhinia had eight species.
Observation Acacia, Indigofera and Litsea each had seven species.
Observation Mallotus and Phyllanthus each had seven species.
Observation The inventory recorded 809 species used for 49 diseases or medical uses.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A major taxonomic revision of Ardisia and at least 19 related genera is required for monophyly.

Taxon: ArdisiaArdisiae0
Outcome: a major taxonomic revision of Ardisia and at least 19 closely related generae0

Verbatim

e0
“a major taxonomic revision of Ardisia and at least 19 closely related genera is required to circumscribe monophyletic genera.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2898–3023

Title

Phylogenomic Perspectives on Evolutionary History: Examples from the Flowering Plant Lineage Ericales

Larson, Drew Deep Blue (University of Michigan) 2022. doi:10.7302/4612

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ardisiacrispin D–F have a non-arabinopyranose monosaccharide linked to aglycone C-3.

Taxon: ArdisiaArdisiae0
Outcome: monosaccharide directly linked to aglycone C-3 of triterpenoid saponinse0
Qualifier: non-arabinopyranosee0

Verbatim

e0
“Ardisiacrispin D–F (1–3) are first examples that the monosaccharide directly linked to aglycone C-3 of triterpenoid saponins in genus Ardisia are non-arabinopyranose.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–507

Title

Cytotoxic 13,28 Epoxy Bridged Oleanane-Type Triterpenoid Saponins from the Roots of Ardisia crispa

Xin Yin; Ruihang Hu; Yongqiang Zhou; et al. Molecules 2022. doi:10.3390/molecules27031061

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ardisia was not monophyletic unless four related genera were included.

Taxon: ArdisiaArdisiae0
Outcome: not monophyletice0
Qualifier: unless Sardiria, Hymenandra, Badula and Oncostemum are includede0

Verbatim

e0
“The molecular phylogeny suggested Ardisia is not monophyletic, unless Sardiria, Hymenandra, Badula and Oncostemum are included.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1327

Title

Molecular phylogeny of Asian Ardisia (Myrsinoideae, Primulaceae) and their leaf-nodulated endosymbionts, Burkholderia s.l. (Burkholderiaceae)

Chen-Jui Yang; Jer-Ming Hu PLoS ONE 2022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261188

Other claims from this paper (7)

Recommendation The generic limits in Myrsinoideae require further revision.
Observation Crispardisia, Pimelandra and Stylardisia were supported as monophyletic.
Observation Bladhia was separated into two distant clades.
Recommendation The authors proposed dividing Bladhia into two subgenera.
Observation Strict cospeciation between Ardisia and Burkholderia was rejected.
Observation Ardisia and Burkholderia had general phylogenetic concordance.
Observation Cospeciation, host switching and loss events were inferred for the symbiosis.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strict cospeciation between Ardisia and Burkholderia was rejected.

Taxon: ArdisiaArdisiae0
Interactor: BurkholderiaBurkholderiae0symbiont
Outcome: rejected strict cospeciation hypothesise0

Verbatim

e0
“Both of the cophylogenetic analyses and topology tests rejected strict cospeciation hypothesis between Ardisia hosts and symbiotic Burkholderia.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1823

Title

Molecular phylogeny of Asian Ardisia (Myrsinoideae, Primulaceae) and their leaf-nodulated endosymbionts, Burkholderia s.l. (Burkholderiaceae)

Chen-Jui Yang; Jer-Ming Hu PLoS ONE 2022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261188

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Ardisia was not monophyletic unless four related genera were included.
Recommendation The generic limits in Myrsinoideae require further revision.
Observation Crispardisia, Pimelandra and Stylardisia were supported as monophyletic.
Observation Bladhia was separated into two distant clades.
Recommendation The authors proposed dividing Bladhia into two subgenera.
Observation Ardisia and Burkholderia had general phylogenetic concordance.
Observation Cospeciation, host switching and loss events were inferred for the symbiosis.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ardisia and Burkholderia had general phylogenetic concordance.

Taxon: ArdisiaArdisiae0
Interactor: BurkholderiaBurkholderiae0symbiont
Outcome: general phylogenetic concordancee0

Verbatim

e0
“Cophylogenetic analyses showed general phylogenetic concordance of Ardisia and Burkholderia, and cospeciation events, host-switching events and loss events were all inferred.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1998

Title

Molecular phylogeny of Asian Ardisia (Myrsinoideae, Primulaceae) and their leaf-nodulated endosymbionts, Burkholderia s.l. (Burkholderiaceae)

Chen-Jui Yang; Jer-Ming Hu PLoS ONE 2022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261188

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Ardisia was not monophyletic unless four related genera were included.
Recommendation The generic limits in Myrsinoideae require further revision.
Observation Crispardisia, Pimelandra and Stylardisia were supported as monophyletic.
Observation Bladhia was separated into two distant clades.
Recommendation The authors proposed dividing Bladhia into two subgenera.
Observation Strict cospeciation between Ardisia and Burkholderia was rejected.
Observation Cospeciation, host switching and loss events were inferred for the symbiosis.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cospeciation, host switching and loss events were inferred for the symbiosis.

Taxon: ArdisiaArdisiae0
Interactor: BurkholderiaBurkholderiae0symbiont
Outcome: cospeciation events, host-switching events and loss eventse0

Verbatim

e0
“Cophylogenetic analyses showed general phylogenetic concordance of Ardisia and Burkholderia, and cospeciation events, host-switching events and loss events were all inferred.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1998

Title

Molecular phylogeny of Asian Ardisia (Myrsinoideae, Primulaceae) and their leaf-nodulated endosymbionts, Burkholderia s.l. (Burkholderiaceae)

Chen-Jui Yang; Jer-Ming Hu PLoS ONE 2022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261188

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Ardisia was not monophyletic unless four related genera were included.
Recommendation The generic limits in Myrsinoideae require further revision.
Observation Crispardisia, Pimelandra and Stylardisia were supported as monophyletic.
Observation Bladhia was separated into two distant clades.
Recommendation The authors proposed dividing Bladhia into two subgenera.
Observation Strict cospeciation between Ardisia and Burkholderia was rejected.
Observation Ardisia and Burkholderia had general phylogenetic concordance.

Ardisia 117 claims

117 claims